Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27553792›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017

Impact of prior interventions on outcomes during per oral endoscopic myotomy.

Brian E Louie, Andreas M Schneider, Drew B Schembre, Ralph W Aye

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Revisional Therapy for Recurrent Symptoms After Heller Myotomy for Achalasia.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Modern Age of POEM: the Past, Present and Future of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. UEG Week 2019 Poster Presentations.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019
    Article
  13. Recent Advances in Third-Space Endoscopy.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. New endoscopic classification of esophageal mucosa in achalasia: A predictor for submucosal fibrosis.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian E LouieDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute and Medical Center, 1101 Madison Street Suite 900, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA. brian.louie@swedish.org.
Andreas M SchneiderDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute and Medical Center, 1101 Madison Street Suite 900, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Drew B SchembreDivision of Gastroenterology, Swedish Cancer Institute and Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ralph W AyeDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute and Medical Center, 1101 Madison Street Suite 900, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Swedish Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPer oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is performed by accessing the submucosal space of the esophagus. This space may be impacted by prior interventions such as submucosal injections, dilations or previous myotomies. These interventions could make POEM more difficult and may deter surgeons during their initial experience. We sought to determine the impact of prior interventions on our early experience.

methodsProspective, single-center study of consecutive patients undergoing POEM. Patients were grouped according to their anticipated complexity: Group A: no prior interventions (N = 19); Group B: prior interventions such as submucosal injections and/or dilations (N = 11) and  Group C: sigmoidal esophagus, prior esophageal surgery, balloon dilation >30 mm (N = 8). We compared operative times, inadvertent mucosotomy rates, complications and short-term outcomes between groups.

resultsA total of 38 patients underwent POEM for achalasia subtypes: I (N = 9), II (N = 19) and III (N = 7). Three had other dysmotility disorders. Patients between the groups were similar. Operative times were similar between Group A and Group B but significantly longer for Group C (133 vs. 132 vs. 210 min, p = 0.001). Mucosotomy rates were highest in Group A (6/19) with 1 each in Group B/C (p = 0.46). One patient in Group A required an esophageal stent. Eckardt scores improved in all groups (6-1; 8-2; 6-0.5, p = 0.73), and postoperative GERD-HRQL scores were similar. One patient underwent laparoscopic myotomy for persistent symptoms with no improvement, and one patient underwent esophagectomy for a sigmoid esophagus and persistent symptoms despite adequate myotomy.

conclusionA prior intervention does not seem to impact short-term clinical outcomes with POEM. Patients who had submucosal injections or small caliber dilations are similar to patients with no prior inventions; however, patients with a sigmoid-shaped esophagus and/or a prior myotomy require nearly double the operative time. Endoscopists undertaking POEM should consider these during their learning curve.

Indexed as

Natural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryAdultAgedEsophageal AchalasiaEsophageal MucosaEsophageal Sphincter, LowerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAchalasiaBalloon dilationBotulinum toxinMyotomyOutcomesPer oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)

Identifiers

PMID27553792
OpenAlexW2514300974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.