ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017
Impact of prior interventions on outcomes during per oral endoscopic myotomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of prior endoscopic or surgical interventions on clinical outcomes after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Observational
- Peroral endoscopic myotomy: is it better to perform it in naive patients or as second-line therapy? Results of an open-label-controlled study in 105 patients.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Revisional Therapy for Recurrent Symptoms After Heller Myotomy for Achalasia.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022Article
- An Updated Meta-analysis: Similar Clinical Efficacy of Anterior and Posterior Approaches in Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Achalasia.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2022Review
- Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia after failed pneumatic dilation.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Use of the functional luminal imaging probe in pediatrics: A comparison study of patients with achalasia before and after endoscopic dilation and non-achalasia controls.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2021Article
- Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs pneumatic dilation (PD) in treatment of achalasia: A meta-analysis of studies with ≥ 12-month follow-up.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy in challenging achalasia patients: a long-term follow-up study.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- The Modern Age of POEM: the Past, Present and Future of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021Review
- Comparison of peroral endoscopic myotomy between de-novo achalasia and achalasia with prior treatment.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Gas Leak and Mucosal Injury During Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy After Previous Myotomy: A Single-Center Experience.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2021Article
- UEG Week 2019 Poster Presentations.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019Article
- Recent Advances in Third-Space Endoscopy.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018Article
- The current state of per oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia.Journal of visualized surgery · 2017Review
- New endoscopic classification of esophageal mucosa in achalasia: A predictor for submucosal fibrosis.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPer oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is performed by accessing the submucosal space of the esophagus. This space may be impacted by prior interventions such as submucosal injections, dilations or previous myotomies. These interventions could make POEM more difficult and may deter surgeons during their initial experience. We sought to determine the impact of prior interventions on our early experience.
methodsProspective, single-center study of consecutive patients undergoing POEM. Patients were grouped according to their anticipated complexity: Group A: no prior interventions (N = 19); Group B: prior interventions such as submucosal injections and/or dilations (N = 11) and Group C: sigmoidal esophagus, prior esophageal surgery, balloon dilation >30 mm (N = 8). We compared operative times, inadvertent mucosotomy rates, complications and short-term outcomes between groups.
resultsA total of 38 patients underwent POEM for achalasia subtypes: I (N = 9), II (N = 19) and III (N = 7). Three had other dysmotility disorders. Patients between the groups were similar. Operative times were similar between Group A and Group B but significantly longer for Group C (133 vs. 132 vs. 210 min, p = 0.001). Mucosotomy rates were highest in Group A (6/19) with 1 each in Group B/C (p = 0.46). One patient in Group A required an esophageal stent. Eckardt scores improved in all groups (6-1; 8-2; 6-0.5, p = 0.73), and postoperative GERD-HRQL scores were similar. One patient underwent laparoscopic myotomy for persistent symptoms with no improvement, and one patient underwent esophagectomy for a sigmoid esophagus and persistent symptoms despite adequate myotomy.
conclusionA prior intervention does not seem to impact short-term clinical outcomes with POEM. Patients who had submucosal injections or small caliber dilations are similar to patients with no prior inventions; however, patients with a sigmoid-shaped esophagus and/or a prior myotomy require nearly double the operative time. Endoscopists undertaking POEM should consider these during their learning curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.