Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27553788›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2016

Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography: Evolving Applications in the Era of Value-Based Healthcare.

Amita Singh, R Parker Ward

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amita SinghSection of Cardiology, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC6080, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
R Parker WardSection of Cardiology, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC6080, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. pward@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARDIAC SCIENCEST32HL007381 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI JEANNE M DECARA, Yoav Gilad · 1985 to 2026
$12.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current climate in healthcare is increasingly emphasizing a value-based approach to diagnostic testing. Cardiac imaging, including echocardiography, has been a primary target of ongoing reforms in healthcare delivery and reimbursement. The Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for echocardiography is a physician-derived tool intended to guide utilization in optimal patient care. To date, the AUC have primarily been employed solely as justification for reimbursement, though evolving broader applications to guide clinical decision-making suggest a far more valuable role in the delivery of high-quality and high-value healthcare.

Indexed as

Cardiac Imaging TechniquesCardiovascular DiseasesEchocardiographyHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicRegional Health PlanningValue-Based PurchasingAppropriate useEchocardiographyHealthcare policy

Identifiers

PMID27553788
PMCPMC5372349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.