Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27553652›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2016

Teamwork enables high level of early mobilization in critically ill patients.

Cheryl Elizabeth Hickmann, Diego Castanares-Zapatero, Emilie Bialais, Jonathan Dugernier, Antoine Tordeur, Lise Colmant, Xavier Wittebole, Giuseppe Tirone, Jean Roeseler, Pierre-François Laterre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Acute Hemodynamic Changes Induced by Physiotherapy in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cheryl Elizabeth HickmannIntensive Care Unit, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Diego Castanares-ZapateroIntensive Care Unit, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Emilie BialaisIntensive Care Unit, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Jonathan DugernierIntensive Care Unit, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Antoine TordeurIntensive Care Unit, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Lise ColmantIntensive Care Unit, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Xavier WitteboleIntensive Care Unit, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Giuseppe TironeIntensive Care Unit, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean RoeselerIntensive Care Unit, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Pierre-François LaterreIntensive Care Unit, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. pierre-francois.laterre@uclouvain.be.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly mobilization in critically ill patients has been shown to prevent bed-rest-associated morbidity. Reported reasons for not mobilizing patients, thereby excluding or delaying such intervention, are diverse and comprise safety considerations for high-risk critically ill patients with multiple organ support systems. This study sought to demonstrate that early mobilization performed within the first 24 h of ICU admission proves to be feasible and well tolerated in the vast majority of critically ill patients.

resultsGeneral practice data were collected for 171 consecutive admissions to our ICU over a 2-month period according to a local, standardized, early mobilization protocol. The total period covered 731 patient-days, 22 (3 %) of which met our local exclusion criteria for mobilization. Of the remaining 709 patient-days, early mobilization was achieved on 86 % of them, bed-to-chair transfer on 74 %, and at least one physical therapy session on 59 %. Median time interval from ICU admission to the first early mobilization activity was 19 h (IQR = 15-23). In patients on mechanical ventilation (51 %), accounting for 46 % of patient-days, 35 % were administered vasopressors and 11 % continuous renal replacement therapy. Within this group, bed-to-chair transfer was achieved on 68 % of patient-days and at least one early mobilization activity on 80 %. Limiting factors to start early mobilization included restricted staffing capacities, diagnostic or surgical procedures, patients' refusal, as well as severe hemodynamic instability. Hemodynamic parameters were rarely affected during mobilization, causing interruption in only 0.8 % of all activities, primarily due to reversible hypotension or arrhythmia. In general, all activities were well tolerated, while patients were able to self-regulate their active early mobilization. Patients' subjective perception of physical therapy was reported to be enjoyable.

conclusionsMobilization within the first 24 h of ICU admission is achievable in the majority of critical ill patients, in spite of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor administration, or renal replacement therapy.

Indexed as

Early mobilizationIntensive care unitMechanical ventilationPerceptionPhysical therapyTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID27553652
PMCPMC4995191
OpenAlexW2514567689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.