Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27553640›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2017

Psychotropic drug dispensing in people with and without cancer in France.

Pierre Verger, Sébastien Cortaredona, Marie Tournier, Dominique Rey, Marc-Karim Bendiane, Patrick Peretti-Watel, Hélène Verdoux

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Potential Drug Interactions Between Psychotropics and Intravenous Chemotherapeutics Used by Patients With Cancer.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2022
    Article
  4. Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pierre VergerINSERM, UMR912 (SESSTIM), Marseille, France.
Sébastien CortaredonaINSERM, UMR912 (SESSTIM), Marseille, France. sebastien.cortaredona@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-3523-7158
Marie TournierUniversité de Bordeaux, U657, Bordeaux, France.
Dominique ReyINSERM, UMR912 (SESSTIM), Marseille, France.
Marc-Karim BendianeINSERM, UMR912 (SESSTIM), Marseille, France.
Patrick Peretti-WatelINSERM, UMR912 (SESSTIM), Marseille, France.
Hélène VerdouxUniversité de Bordeaux, U657, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare annual and monthly prevalence of psychotropic drug (PD) dispensing and the number and duration of psychotropic treatment episodes among people with and without cancer over a 2-year follow-up.

methodsWe studied the following two cohorts of adult patients affiliated with the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF): cancer patients followed for 2 years after diagnosis and individuals without cancer matched to cancer patients. Using information about anxiolytic, hypnotic, antidepressant, and antipsychotic dispensing in community pharmacies, we applied conditional log-binomial regressions to estimate adjusted relative risks for monthly dispensing of PDs.

resultsAnnual prevalence of PD dispensing-all categories included-among cancer patients was significantly higher for almost all the categories we studied than among individuals without cancer. Monthly prevalence of anxiolytic/hypnotic dispensing started to rise several months before diagnosis and peaked immediately after. Among patients with cancer and their matched controls, treatment duration exceeded 1 month for hypnotics in 40 and 35 %, respectively (p < 0.01), and 3 months for anxiolytics in 23 and 23 % (p = 0.8); it was less than 6 months for antidepressants in 76 and 75 % (p = 0.5).

conclusionsPrevalence of psychotropic treatment was higher among cancer patients than among persons without cancer. Psychotropic treatment duration was not in line with recommendations for significant fractions of cancer patients or their controls. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Training of health professionals involved in cancer supportive care should be reinforced and specific guidelines developed to help them address psychological distress of cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrevalencePsychotropic DrugsSurvivorsPsychotropic DrugsCancerHealth insurance reimbursementOncologyPsychotropic drugsQuality of health careSurvivors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.