Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27553627›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2016

High prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in the Thai population: a prospective screening colonoscopy of 1,404 cases.

Bunchorn Siripongpreeda, Chulabhorn Mahidol, Navara Dusitanond, Tassanee Sriprayoon, Bunlung Muyphuag, Thaniya Sricharunrat, Narongchai Teerayatanakul, Watanya Chaiwong, Wipra Worasawate, Prassanee Sattayarungsee and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bunchorn SiripongpreedaChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. bunchorn_sir@yahoo.com.
Chulabhorn MahidolChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Navara DusitanondChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tassanee SriprayoonChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Bunlung MuyphuagChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thaniya SricharunratChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Narongchai TeerayatanakulChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Watanya ChaiwongChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wipra WorasawateChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Prassanee SattayarungseeChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Juthamas SangthongdeeChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jirapa PraromChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Gaidganok SornsamdangChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kamonwan SoonklangChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kasiruck WittayasakChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chirayu U AuewarakulChulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chulabhorn Hospital · THSiriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer is evident in recent years in the developing Asian nations. Particularly in Thailand and most neighbouring low-income countries, screening colonoscopy is not yet recommended nor implemented at the national policy level.

methodsScreening colonoscopy was offered to 1,500 healthy volunteers aged 50-65 years old who were registered into the program between July 2009 and June 2010. Biopsy and surgery was performed depending on the identified lesions. Fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) were additionally performed for comparison with colonoscopy.

resultsThere were 1,404 participants who underwent colonoscopy. The mean age of the cohort was 56.9 ± 4.2 years and 69.4 % were females. About 30 % (411 cases) of all colonoscopies had abnormal colonoscopic findings, and of these, 256 cases had adenomatous polyps. High risk adenomas (villous or tubulovillous or high grade dysplasia or size > 1 cm or > 3 adenomatous polyps) were found in 98 cases (7 %), low risk adenoma in 158 cases (11.3 %), and hyperplastic polyps in 119 cases (8.5 %). Eighteen cases (1.3 %) had colorectal cancer and 90 % of them (16 cases) were non-metastatic including five stage 0 cases, seven stage I cases, and four stage IIA cases. Only two cases had metastasis: one to regional lymph nodes (stage IIIB) and another to other organs (stage IVA). The most common cancer site was the distal intestine including rectum (7 cases, 38.9 %) and sigmoid colon (7 cases, 38.9 %). Ten colorectal cancer cases had positive FIT whereas 8 colorectal cancer cases were FIT-negative. The sensitivity and specificity of FIT was 55.6 % and 96.2 %, respectively, while the positive predictive value was 16.4 % and negative predictive value was 99.4 %. The overall survival of colorectal cancer cases at 5-year was 83.3 %.

conclusionHigh prevalence of colorectal cancer and high-risk adenoma was found in the Thai population aged 50-65 years old by screening colonoscopy. FIT was not sensitive enough to detect colorectal cancer in this asymptomatic cohort. Integration of screening colonoscopy into the national cancer screening program should be implemented to detect early cases of advanced colorectal neoplasia and improve survival of colorectal cancer patients in Thailand.

Indexed as

AdenomaAgedColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsFecesFemaleHumansImmunochemistryMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrevalenceProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityAdenomaAdvanced colorectal neoplasiaColorectal cancerFecal immunochemical testNational policyScreening colonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID27553627
PMCPMC4995664
OpenAlexW2507706011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.