Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27553489›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

Interpreting transcriptional changes using causal graphs: new methods and their practical utility on public networks.

Carl Tony Fakhry, Parul Choudhary, Alex Gutteridge, Ben Sidders, Ping Chen, Daniel Ziemek, Kourosh Zarringhalam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Shared gene targets of the ATF4 and p53 transcriptional networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hearing impairment due toDisease models & mechanisms · 2020
    Article
  16. Non-Coding RNAs in the Brain-Heart Axis: The Case of Parkinson's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carl Tony FakhryDepartment of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, 02125, USA.
Parul ChoudharyComputational Sciences, Pfizer Worldwide Research & Development, Cambridge, USA.
Alex GutteridgeComputational Sciences, Pfizer Worldwide Research & Development, Cambridge, USA.
Ben SiddersComputational Sciences, Pfizer Worldwide Research & Development, Cambridge, USA.
Ping ChenDepartment of Engineering, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, 100 Morrissey Boulevard02125, USA.
Daniel ZiemekComputational Sciences, Pfizer Worldwide Research & Development, Berlin, USA.
Kourosh ZarringhalamDepartment of Mathematics, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, 02125, USA. kourosh.zarringhalam@umb.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInference of active regulatory cascades under specific molecular and environmental perturbations is a recurring task in transcriptional data analysis. Commercial tools based on large, manually curated networks of causal relationships offering such functionality have been used in thousands of articles in the biomedical literature. The adoption and extension of such methods in the academic community has been hampered by the lack of freely available, efficient algorithms and an accompanying demonstration of their applicability using current public networks.

resultsIn this article, we propose a new statistical method that will infer likely upstream regulators based on observed patterns of up- and down-regulated transcripts. The method is suitable for use with public interaction networks with a mix of signed and unsigned causal edges. It subsumes and extends two previously published approaches and we provide a novel algorithmic method for efficient statistical inference. Notably, we demonstrate the feasibility of using the approach to generate biological insights given current public networks in the context of controlled in-vitro overexpression experiments, stem-cell differentiation data and animal disease models. We also provide an efficient implementation of our method in the R package QuaternaryProd available to download from Bioconductor.

conclusionsIn this work, we have closed an important gap in utilizing causal networks to analyze differentially expressed genes. Our proposed Quaternary test statistic incorporates all available evidence on the potential relevance of an upstream regulator. The new approach broadens the use of these types of statistics for highly curated signed networks in which ambiguities arise but also enables the use of networks with unsigned edges. We design and implement a novel computational method that can efficiently estimate p-values for upstream regulators in current biological settings. We demonstrate the ready applicability of the implemented method to analyze differentially expressed genes using the publicly available networks.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsCell DifferentiationData Interpretation, StatisticalGene Expression RegulationHumansStem CellsTranscription, GeneticCausal reasoning on biological networksGene set enrichment analysisInference on gene regulatory networks

Identifiers

PMID27553489
PMCPMC4995651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.