Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27553378›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2016

Lung hyperaeration assessment by computed tomography: correction of reconstruction-induced bias.

Lorenzo Ball, Claudia Brusasco, Francesco Corradi, Francesco Paparo, Alessandro Garlaschi, Peter Herrmann, Michael Quintel, Paolo Pelosi

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lung imaging: how to get better look inside the lung.Annals of translational medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lorenzo BallDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. lorenzo.ball@edu.unige.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3876-4730
Claudia BrusascoAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy.
Francesco CorradiAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy.
Francesco PaparoRadiology Department, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy.
Alessandro GarlaschiDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, IRCCS-Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria-IST, Genova, Italy.
Peter HerrmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Michael QuintelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Paolo PelosiDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputed tomography (CT) reconstruction parameters, such as slice thickness and convolution kernel, significantly affect the quantification of hyperaerated parenchyma (VHYPER%). The aim of this study was to investigate the mathematical relation between VHYPER% calculated at different reconstruction settings, in mechanically ventilated and spontaneously breathing patients with different lung pathology.

methodsIn this retrospective observational study, CT scans of patients of the intensive care unit and emergency department were collected from two CT scanners and analysed with different kernel-thickness combinations (reconstructions): 1.25 mm soft kernel, 5 mm soft kernel, 5 mm sharp kernel in the first scanner; 2.5 mm slice thickness with a smooth (B41s) and a sharp (B70s) kernel on the second scanner. A quantitative analysis was performed with Maluna® to assess lung aeration compartments as percent of total lung volume. CT variables calculated with different reconstructions were compared in pairs, and their mathematical relationship was analysed by using quadratic and power functions.

results43 subjects were included in the present analysis. Image reconstruction parameters influenced all the quantitative CT-derived variables. The most relevant changes occurred in the hyperaerated and normally aerated volume compartments. The application of a power correction formula led to a significant reduction in the bias between VHYPER% estimations (p < 0.001 in all cases). The bias in VHYPER% assessment did not differ between lung pathology nor ventilation mode groups (p > 0.15 in all cases).

conclusionsHyperaerated percent volume at different reconstruction settings can be described by a fixed mathematical relationship, independent of lung pathology, ventilation mode, and type of CT scanner.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLungLung Volume MeasurementsMaleMiddle AgedRespirationRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID27553378
PMCPMC4995787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.