Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27553253›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2016

Are online symptoms checkers useful for patients with inflammatory arthritis?

Lucy Powley, Graham McIlroy, Gwenda Simons, Karim Raza

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucy PowleyDepartment of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Dudley Road, Birmingham, West Midlands, B18 7QH, UK.
Graham McIlroyDepartment of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Dudley Road, Birmingham, West Midlands, B18 7QH, UK.
Gwenda SimonsInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Karim RazaDepartment of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Dudley Road, Birmingham, West Midlands, B18 7QH, UK. k.raza@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1570-1232

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnline symptom checkers are increasingly used by patients however there is little published evidence of their effectiveness in real patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate how patients with inflammatory arthritis and inflammatory arthralgia use the internet to look for health information and to assess the advice given and diagnoses suggested by the NHS and WebMD symptom checkers in relation to the patients' actual diagnoses.

methodsThirty-four patients with inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis (n = 13), psoriatic arthritis (n = 4), unclassified arthritis (n = 4)) and inflammatory arthralgia (n = 13) newly presenting to a secondary care based clinic were identified using a consecutive sampling approach. Consenting patients were asked questions about their internet use in relation to their presenting symptoms. They then completed the NHS and the WebMD symptom checkers and their answers and the outcomes were recorded.

resultsSixteen patients had previously consulted the internet regarding their symptoms. Neither age nor gender significantly influenced internet usage. Actions advised via the NHS symptom checker were: call an ambulance (n = 11), attend A&E (n = 4), contact your GP straight away (n = 2), see your GP today (n = 6), or see your GP within 36 h (n = 11). The 5 most common differential diagnoses given by Web MD were gout (n = 28), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 24), psoriatic arthritis (n = 22), osteoarthritis (n = 18) and finger dislocation (n = 10). The most common first differential diagnosis was osteoarthritis (n = 12). Only 4 out of 21 patients with inflammatory arthritis were given a first diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis.

conclusionsOur data highlight that help seeking advice given online is often inappropriate and that the diagnoses suggested are frequently inaccurate. Recommendations to seek emergency advice may cause inappropriate healthcare utilization.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthralgiaArthritis, PsoriaticArthritis, RheumatoidDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGoutHealth Care SurveysHumansInternetJoint DislocationsMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritisPatient Acceptance of Health CareArthralgiaInflammatory arthritisInternetSymptom checker

Identifiers

PMID27553253
PMCPMC4995741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.