ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2017
Selecting relevant 3D image features of margin sharpness and texture for lung nodule retrieval.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A study of MRI-based radiomics biomarkers for sacroiliitis and spondyloarthritis.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020Article
- CT-based radiomics for prediction of histologic subtype and metastatic disease in primary malignant lung neoplasms.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020Article
- Artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer-aided diagnosis, and radiomics: advances in imaging towards to precision medicine.Radiologia brasileiraReview
- Radiomic analysis of lung cancer for the assessment of patient prognosis and intratumor heterogeneity.Radiologia brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. Its diagnosis is a challenge task to specialists due to several aspects on the classification of lung nodules. Therefore, it is important to integrate content-based image retrieval methods on the lung nodule classification process, since they are capable of retrieving similar cases from databases that were previously diagnosed. However, this mechanism depends on extracting relevant image features in order to obtain high efficiency. The goal of this paper is to perform the selection of 3D image features of margin sharpness and texture that can be relevant on the retrieval of similar cancerous and benign lung nodules.
methodsA total of 48 3D image attributes were extracted from the nodule volume. Border sharpness features were extracted from perpendicular lines drawn over the lesion boundary. Second-order texture features were extracted from a cooccurrence matrix. Relevant features were selected by a correlation-based method and a statistical significance analysis. Retrieval performance was assessed according to the nodule's potential malignancy on the 10 most similar cases and by the parameters of precision and recall.
resultsStatistical significant features reduced retrieval performance. Correlation-based method selected 2 margin sharpness attributes and 6 texture attributes and obtained higher precision compared to all 48 extracted features on similar nodule retrieval.
conclusionFeature space dimensionality reduction of 83 % obtained higher retrieval performance and presented to be a computationaly low cost method of retrieving similar nodules for the diagnosis of lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27553081What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.