ArticleBMC medical ethics2016
Using digital technologies to engage with medical research: views of myotonic dystrophy patients in Japan.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- A scoping review of health literacy in rare disorders: key issues and research directions.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Trends in Population-Based Studies: Molecular and Digital Epidemiology (Review).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2022Review
- Reflections on dynamic consent in biomedical research: the story so far.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021Article
- The practice of active patient involvement in rare disease research using ICT: experiences and lessons from the RUDY JAPAN project.Research involvement and engagement · 2021Article
- Gap between real-world data and clinical research within hospitals in China: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Dwarna: a blockchain solution for dynamic consent in biobanking.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2020Article
- Using Patient and Family Engagement Strategies to Improve Outcomes of Health Information Technology Initiatives: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Informed Consent in Biomedical Research.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Review
- Tensions in ethics and policy created by National Precision Medicine Programs.Human genomics · 2018Article
- Equitable Participation in Biobanks: The Risks and Benefits of a "Dynamic Consent" Approach.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
- Exploring patient and family involvement in the lifecycle of an orphan drug: a scoping review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2017Article
- Participant-Centric Initiatives and Medical Research: Scoping Review Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2017Article
- Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research.BMC medical ethics · 2017Article
- Introduction to the article collection 'Translation in healthcare: ethical, legal, and social implications'.BMC medical ethics · 2016Article
- Recommendations for the Use of ICT in Elderly Populations with Affective Disorders.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs in other countries, the traditional doctor-patient relationship in the Japanese healthcare system has often been characterised as being of a paternalistic nature. However, in recent years there has been a gradual shift towards a more participatory-patient model in Japan. With advances in technology, the possibility to use digital technologies to improve patient interactions is growing and is in line with changing attitudes in the medical profession and society within Japan and elsewhere. The implementation of an online patient engagement platform is being considered by the Myotonic Dystrophy Registry of Japan. The aim of this exploratory study was to understand patients' views and attitudes to using digital tools in patient registries and engagement with medical research in Japan, prior to implementation of the digital platform.
methodsWe conducted an exploratory, cross-sectional, self-completed questionnaire with a sample of myotonic dystrophy (MD) patients attending an Open Day at Osaka University, Japan. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were 18 years or older, and were diagnosed with MD.
resultsA total of 68 patients and family members attended the Open Day and were invited to participate in the survey. Of those, 59 % submitted a completed questionnaire (n = 40). The survey showed that the majority of patients felt that they were not receiving the information they wanted from their clinicians, which included recent medical research findings and opportunities to participate in clinical trials, and 88 % of patients indicated they would be willing to engage with digital technologies to receive relevant medical information. Patients also expressed an interest in having control over when and how they received this information, as well as being informed of how their data is used and shared with other researchers.
conclusionOverall, the findings from this study suggest that there is scope to develop a digital platform to engage with patients so that they can receive information about medical care and research opportunities. While this study group is a small, self-selecting population, who suffer from a particular condition, the results suggest that there are interested populations within Japan that would appreciate enhanced communication and interaction with healthcare teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.