Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27553007›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2016

Using digital technologies to engage with medical research: views of myotonic dystrophy patients in Japan.

Victoria Coathup, Harriet J A Teare, Jusaku Minari, Go Yoshizawa, Jane Kaye, Masanori P Takahashi, Kazuto Kato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Reflections on dynamic consent in biomedical research: the story so far.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dwarna: a blockchain solution for dynamic consent in biobanking.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Informed Consent in Biomedical Research.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Victoria CoathupCentre for Health, Law and Emerging Technology, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Ewert House, Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7DD, UK.
Harriet J A TeareCentre for Health, Law and Emerging Technology, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Ewert House, Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7DD, UK.
Jusaku MinariDepartment of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Go YoshizawaDepartment of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Jane KayeCentre for Health, Law and Emerging Technology, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Ewert House, Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7DD, UK.
Masanori P TakahashiDepartment of Neurology and Functional Diagnostics Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, D-4, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan. mtakahas@neurol.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Kazuto KatoDepartment of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan. kato@eth.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs in other countries, the traditional doctor-patient relationship in the Japanese healthcare system has often been characterised as being of a paternalistic nature. However, in recent years there has been a gradual shift towards a more participatory-patient model in Japan. With advances in technology, the possibility to use digital technologies to improve patient interactions is growing and is in line with changing attitudes in the medical profession and society within Japan and elsewhere. The implementation of an online patient engagement platform is being considered by the Myotonic Dystrophy Registry of Japan. The aim of this exploratory study was to understand patients' views and attitudes to using digital tools in patient registries and engagement with medical research in Japan, prior to implementation of the digital platform.

methodsWe conducted an exploratory, cross-sectional, self-completed questionnaire with a sample of myotonic dystrophy (MD) patients attending an Open Day at Osaka University, Japan. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were 18 years or older, and were diagnosed with MD.

resultsA total of 68 patients and family members attended the Open Day and were invited to participate in the survey. Of those, 59 % submitted a completed questionnaire (n = 40). The survey showed that the majority of patients felt that they were not receiving the information they wanted from their clinicians, which included recent medical research findings and opportunities to participate in clinical trials, and 88 % of patients indicated they would be willing to engage with digital technologies to receive relevant medical information. Patients also expressed an interest in having control over when and how they received this information, as well as being informed of how their data is used and shared with other researchers.

conclusionOverall, the findings from this study suggest that there is scope to develop a digital platform to engage with patients so that they can receive information about medical care and research opportunities. While this study group is a small, self-selecting population, who suffer from a particular condition, the results suggest that there are interested populations within Japan that would appreciate enhanced communication and interaction with healthcare teams.

Indexed as

AttitudeBiomedical ResearchCommunicationInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetMyotonic DystrophyPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultData sharingDigital technologyDynamic consentElectronic health recordsMyotonic dystrophyParticipant centric initiativesPatient engagementPatient perspectivesPatient privacyPatient views

Identifiers

PMID27553007
PMCPMC4995774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.