ArticleInternational journal of bipolar disorders2016
Online information seeking by patients with bipolar disorder: results from an international multisite survey.
Article in International journal of bipolar disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Social Media Study of Portrayals of Bipolar Disorders on YouTube: Content and Thematic Analyses.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A content-quality and optimization analysis of YouTube as a source of patient information for bipolar disorder.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024Article
- Posting patterns in peer online support forums and their associations with emotions and mood in bipolar disorder: Exploratory analysis.PloS one · 2023Article
- The Current Quality of Web-Based Information on the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Search.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Decision aids linked to the recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: results of the acceptability of a decision aid for patients with generalized anxiety disorder.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Investigating the Obsessive and Compulsive Features of Cyberchondria: A Holistic Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Digital Health Literacy in Bipolar Disorder: International Web-Based Survey.JMIR mental health · 2021Article
- Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2020Article
- Smartphones in mental health: a critical review of background issues, current status and future concerns.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2020Review
- Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Impacts of Web-Based Patient Education on Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: Quasi-Experimental Cluster Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Preferences of Information Dissemination on Treatment for Bipolar Disorder: Patient-Centered Focus Group Study.JMIR mental health · 2019Article
- Supporting Self-Management in Bipolar Disorder: Mixed-Methods Knowledge Translation Study.JMIR mental health · 2019Article
- Chitinase-3-like protein 1 levels in bipolar disorder.Saudi medical journal · 2019Article
- Public Awareness, Beliefs, And Attitudes Toward Bipolar Disorder In Saudi Arabia.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2019Article
- Internet use by older adults with bipolar disorder: international survey results.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2018Article
- Behavioural biomarkers and mobile mental health: a new paradigm.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2018Article
- Erratum to: Online information seeking by patients with bipolar disorder: results from an international multisite survey.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2017Article
- Ethical perspectives on recommending digital technology for patients with mental illness.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2017Review
- Electronic monitoring of self-reported mood: the return of the subjective?International journal of bipolar disorders · 2016Review
- Internet use among persons with common mental disorders: A qualitative study.Industrial psychiatry journalArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
70 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInformation seeking is an important coping mechanism for dealing with chronic illness. Despite a growing number of mental health websites, there is little understanding of how patients with bipolar disorder use the Internet to seek information.
methodsA 39 question, paper-based, anonymous survey, translated into 12 languages, was completed by 1222 patients in 17 countries as a convenience sample between March 2014 and January 2016. All patients had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder from a psychiatrist. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations to account for correlated data.
results976 (81 % of 1212 valid responses) of the patients used the Internet, and of these 750 (77 %) looked for information on bipolar disorder. When looking online for information, 89 % used a computer rather than a smartphone, and 79 % started with a general search engine. The primary reasons for searching were drug side effects (51 %), to learn anonymously (43 %), and for help coping (39 %). About 1/3 rated their search skills as expert, and 2/3 as basic or intermediate. 59 % preferred a website on mental illness and 33 % preferred Wikipedia. Only 20 % read or participated in online support groups. Most patients (62 %) searched a couple times a year. Online information seeking helped about 2/3 to cope (41 % of the entire sample). About 2/3 did not discuss Internet findings with their doctor.
conclusionOnline information seeking helps many patients to cope although alternative information sources remain important. Most patients do not discuss Internet findings with their doctor, and concern remains about the quality of online information especially related to prescription drugs. Patients may not rate search skills accurately, and may not understand limitations of online privacy. More patient education about online information searching is needed and physicians should recommend a few high quality websites.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.