Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27552644›Full record

ArticleJournal of hypertension2016

Accessing clinical services and retention in care following screening for hypertension and diabetes among Malawian adults: an urban/rural comparison.

Crispin Musicha, Amelia C Crampin, Ndoliwe Kayuni, Olivier Koole, Alemayehu Amberbir, Beatrice Mwagomba, Shabbar Jaffar, Moffat J Nyirenda

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hypertension, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Screening strategies for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Crispin MusichaaMalawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit (MEIRU), Lilongwe, Malawi bLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK cMinistry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Amelia C Crampin
Ndoliwe Kayuni
Olivier Koole
Alemayehu Amberbir
Beatrice Mwagomba
Shabbar Jaffar
Moffat J Nyirenda

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInterventions to impact on the burden of chronic noncommunicable diseases, such as hypertension and diabetes, include screening of asymptomatic adults, but little is known about the subsequent course of clinical care. We report on the uptake of referral for clinical assessment and retention in care, following a large urban/rural population screening program in Malawi.

methodsAdult residents were screened for raised blood pressure and raised fasting blood glucose at a demographic surveillance site in rural Karonga District and in urban Area 25, Lilongwe with well supported chronic care clinics. Successful uptake was defined as presenting for clinical assessment within 6 weeks of referral, and nonattenders were followed at home. Logistic regression was used to examine association of uptake with demographic and clinical factors. Retention was assessed using survival analysis techniques.

resultsA total of 27 305 participants were screened for hypertension and diabetes between May 2013 and September 2015. Of these, 4075 (14.9%) were referred for suspected hypertension (3640), diabetes (172), or both (263). Among those referred, 2480 (60.9%), reported for clinical assessment. Factors associated with uptake of care included being female, rural residency, older age, unemployment, prior medication, and diabetes. Retention, for those enrolled in care following a formal clinical assessment, was associated with the final diagnosis following clinical assessment, rural residency, and older age.

conclusionScreening for hypertension and diabetes identifies large numbers of individuals who need further clinical assessment, but strategies are needed to ensure better linkage and retention into care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansHypertensionLogistic ModelsMalawiMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareReferral and ConsultationRural PopulationSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID27552644
PMCPMC5790170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.