Observational studyRadiology2017
Colorectal Findings at Repeat CT Colonography Screening after Initial CT Colonography Screening Negative for Polyps Larger than 5 mm.
Observational study in Radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- High Concordance of CT Colonography and Colonoscopy Allows for the Distinguishing and Diagnosing of Intestinal Diseases.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- CT Colonography Is the Perfect Colorectal Screening Test That Unfortunately Few People Use Yet.Korean journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Follow-up outcomes in patients with negative initial colon capsule endoscopy findings.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021Article
- Cost-effectiveness of surveillance with CT colonography after resection of colorectal cancer.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Volumetric growth rates of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps observed in situ at longitudinal CT colonography.European radiology · 2019Article
- Population-based opportunistic osteoporosis screening: Validation of a fully automated CT tool for assessing longitudinal BMD changes.The British journal of radiology · 2019Article
- Computed Tomography Colonography Less Costly Than Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening of Commercially Insured Patients.American health & drug benefits · 2018Article
- Colon cancer screening with CT colonography: logistics, cost-effectiveness, efficiency and progress.The British journal of radiology · 2018Review
- The Natural History of Colorectal Polyps: Overview of Predictive Static and Dynamic Features.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2018Review
- CT colonography: over two decades from discovery to practice.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2018Review
- Screening and Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer Using CT Colonography.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To determine the rate and types of polyps detected at repeat computed tomographic (CT) colonography screening after initial negative findings at CT colonography screening. Materials and Methods Among 5640 negative CT colonography screenings (no polyps ≥ 6 mm) performed before 2010 at one medical center, 1429 (25.3%; mean age, 61.4 years; 736 women, 693 men) patients have returned for repeat CT colonography screening (mean interval, 5.7 years ± 0.9; range, 4.5-10.7 years). Positive rates and histologic findings of initial and repeat screening were compared in this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study. For all patients with positive findings at repeat CT colonography, the findings were directly compared against the initial CT colonography findings. Fisher exact, Pearson χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.