SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2016
Instruments for assessing readiness to commence suck feeds in preterm infants: effects on time to establish full oral feeding and duration of hospitalisation.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of physiological flexion swaddling and oromotor interventions in improving preterm infants' oral feeding ability in the NICU: a randomized controlled trial.Jornal de pediatriaTrial
- Adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the early feeding skill assessment tool for low birth weight infants.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of nurse-led combined modalities on the physiological parameters of preterm neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units at a selected tertiary care hospital.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- The transition from tube feeding to oral feeding algorithm in preterm infants: case-control study.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- A Single-Subject Study to Consider the Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention Combined with Kinesio-Tape in Premature Infants with Feeding Problems.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- Effects of Complete Oral Motor Intervention and Nonnutritive Sucking Alone on the Feeding Performance of Premature Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- The effect of instructing mothers in attachment behaviors on short-term health outcomes of premature infants in NICU.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Article
- Factors Affecting Oral Feeding Ability in Indonesian Preterm Infants.Pediatric reports · 2022Article
- The Utility of Speech-Language Biomarkers to Predict Oral Feeding Outcomes in the Premature Newborn.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2020Article
- Quantitative assessment of nutritive sucking patterns in preterm infants.Early human development · 2020Article
- Impact of a pre-feeding oral stimulation program on first feed attempt in preterm infants: Double-blind controlled clinical trial.PloS one · 2020Article
- Management of Oral Feeding Challenges in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs): A National Survey in China.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Article
- Full oral feeding is possible before discharge even in extremely preterm infants.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2019Observational
- To: First Brazilian recommendation on physiotherapy with sensory motor stimulation in newborns and infants in the intensive care unit.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensivaArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the most challenging milestones for preterm infants is the acquisition of safe and efficient feeding skills. The majority of healthy full term infants are born with skills to coordinate their suck, swallow and respiration. However, this is not the case for preterm infants who develop these skills gradually as they transition from tube feeding to suck feeds. For preterm infants the ability to engage in oral feeding behaviour is dependent on many factors. The complexity of factors influencing feeding readiness has led some researchers to investigate the use of an individualised assessment of an infant's abilities. A limited number of instruments that aim to indicate an individual infant's readiness to commence either breast or bottle feeding have been developed.
objectivesTo determine the effects of using a feeding readiness instrument when compared to no instrument or another instrument on the outcomes of time to establish full oral feeding and duration of hospitalisations. SEARCH
methodsWe used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2016, Issue 1), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 22 February 2016), EMBASE (1980 to 22 February 2016), and CINAHL (1982 to 22 February 2016). We also searched clinical trials' databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing a formal instrument to assess a preterm infant's readiness to commence suck feeds with either no instrument (usual practice) or another feeding readiness instrument. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The standard methods of Cochrane Neonatal were used. Two authors independently screened potential studies for inclusion. No studies were found that met our inclusion criteria. MAIN
resultsNo studies met the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is currently no evidence to inform clinical practice, with no studies meeting the inclusion criteria for this review. Research is needed in this area to establish an evidence base for the clinical utility of implementing the use of an instrument to assess feeding readiness in the preterm infant population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.