Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27552311›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2016

Macroscopic singlet oxygen modeling for dosimetry of Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy: an in-vivo study.

Haixia Qiu, Michele M Kim, Rozhin Penjweini, Timothy C Zhu

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Physics in medicine and biology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reactive oxygen species explicit dosimetry to predict tumor growth for BPD-mediated vascular photodynamic therapy.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019
    Article
  16. Reactive Oxygen Species Explicit Dosimetry (ROSED) of a Type 1 Photosensitizer.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haixia QiuChinese PLA General Hospital, Department of Laser Medicine, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, ChinabUniversity of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard TRC 4W, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Michele M KimUniversity of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard TRC 4W, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United StatescUniversity of Pennsylvania, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 209 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Rozhin PenjweiniUniversity of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard TRC 4W, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Timothy C ZhuUniversity of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard TRC 4W, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

TUMOR HYPOXIA, PHOTOSENSITIZER, VASCULARITY AND PDTP01CA087971 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BUSCH, THERESA M, CENGEL, KEITH A · 2001 to 2019
$24.8M
Image-guided treatment planning for pleural Photodynamic TherapyR01CA154562 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ZHU, TIMOTHY C. · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA087971NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an established modality for cancer treatment, current dosimetric quantities, such as light fluence and PDT dose, do not account for the differences in PDT oxygen consumption for different fluence rates ( ? ). A macroscopic model was adopted to evaluate using calculated reacted singlet oxygen concentration ( [ O 2 1 ] rx ) to predict Photofrin-PDT outcome in mice bearing radiation-induced fibrosarcoma tumors, as singlet oxygen is the primary cytotoxic species responsible for cell death in type II PDT. Using a combination of fluences (50, 135, 200, and 250 ?? J / cm 2 ) and ? (50, 75, and 150 ?? mW / cm 2 ), tumor regrowth rate, k , was determined for each condition. A tumor cure index, CI = 1 ? k / k control , was calculated based on the k between PDT-treated groups and that of the control, Available on the SPIE Digital Library.

Indexed as

Dihematoporphyrin EtherPhotosensitizing AgentsRadiation DosageAnimalsFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C3HModels, BiologicalNeoplasms, ExperimentalPhotochemotherapySinglet OxygenXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysDihematoporphyrin EtherPhotosensitizing AgentsSinglet Oxygen

Identifiers

PMID27552311
PMCPMC5331118
OpenAlexW4247884689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.