Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27552225›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Blood Reference Intervals for Preterm Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan.

Masayuki Ochiai, Yuki Matsushita, Hirosuke Inoue, Takeshi Kusuda, Dongchon Kang, Kiyoshi Ichihara, Naoki Nakashima, Kenji Ihara, Shouichi Ohga, Toshiro Hara and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masayuki OchiaiDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yuki MatsushitaDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hirosuke InoueDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takeshi KusudaDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Dongchon KangDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kiyoshi IchiharaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan.
Naoki NakashimaMedical Information Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kenji IharaDepartment of Perinatal and Pediatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shouichi OhgaDepartment of Perinatal and Pediatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Toshiro HaraDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kyushu University High-Risk Neonatal Clinical Research Network, Japan
Kyushu University · JPKyushu University Hospital · JPYamaguchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preterm low-birth-weight infants remain difficult to manage based on adequate laboratory tests. The aim of this study was to establish blood reference intervals (RIs) in those newborns who were admitted to and survived in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). A multicenter prospective study was conducted among all infants admitted to 11 affiliated NICUs from 2010 to 2013. The clinical information and laboratory data were registered in a network database designed for this study. The RIs for 26 items were derived using the parametric method after applying the latent abnormal values exclusion method. The influence of birth weight (BW) and gestational age (GA) on the test results was expressed in terms of the standard deviation ratio (SDR), as SDRBW and SDRGA, respectively. A total of 3189 infants were admitted during the study period; 246 were excluded due to a lack of blood sampling data, and 234 were excluded for chromosomal abnormalities (n = 108), congenital anomalies requiring treatment with surgical procedures (n = 76), and death or transfer to another hospital (n = 50). As a result, 2709 infants were enrolled in this study. Both the SDRGA and SDRBW were above 0.4 in the test results for total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and red blood cells (RBC); their values increased in proportion to the BW and GA. We derived 26 blood RIs for infants who were admitted to NICUs. These RIs should help in the performance of proper clinical assessments and research in the field of perinatal-neonatal medicine.

Indexed as

Public Health SurveillanceBiomarkersBirth WeightFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalJapanMaleProspective StudiesReference ValuesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID27552225
PMCPMC4994999
OpenAlexW2518585888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.