Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27552160›Full record

ReviewAstrobiology2016

Microbial Morphology and Motility as Biosignatures for Outer Planet Missions.

Jay Nadeau, Chris Lindensmith, Jody W Deming, Vicente I Fernandez, Roman Stocker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Astrobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Viability and Motility ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jay Nadeau1 GALCIT, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California.
Chris Lindensmith2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California.
Jody W Deming3 Department of Biological Oceanography, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Vicente I Fernandez4 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Roman Stocker4 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meaningful motion is an unambiguous biosignature, but because life in the Solar System is most likely to be microbial, the question is whether such motion may be detected effectively on the micrometer scale. Recent results on microbial motility in various Earth environments have provided insight into the physics and biology that determine whether and how microorganisms as small as bacteria and archaea swim, under which conditions, and at which speeds. These discoveries have not yet been reviewed in an astrobiological context. This paper discusses these findings in the context of Earth analog environments and environments expected to be encountered in the outer Solar System, particularly the jovian and saturnian moons. We also review the imaging technologies capable of recording motility of submicrometer-sized organisms and discuss how an instrument would interface with several types of sample-collection strategies. Key Words: In situ measurement-Biosignatures-Microbiology-Europa-Ice. Astrobiology 16, 755-774.

Indexed as

Extraterrestrial EnvironmentSpace FlightArchaeaBacteriaCytoplasmic StreamingEarth, PlanetExobiologyIce CoverJupiterMicroscopyOceans and SeasSaturnWater Microbiology

Identifiers

PMID27552160
PMCPMC5069736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.