Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27552068›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2016

Developing brain networks of attention.

Michael I Posner, Mary K Rothbart, Pascale Voelker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Self-Prioritization Reconsidered: Scrutinizing Three Claims.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Self-relevance and the activation of attentional networks.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  16. Considerations toward an epigenetic and common pathways theory of mental disorder.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael I PosnerUniversity of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Mary K Rothbart
Pascale Voelker

Funding

The Emergence of Self-Control: Comparative Beh. and Neurobiological AssessmentsP01HD060563 · NICHD · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WASHBURN, DAVID A · 2010 to 2014
$4.1M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD060563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAttention is a primary cognitive function critical for perception, language, and memory. We provide an update on brain networks related to attention, their development, training, and pathologies. RECENT

findingsAn executive attention network, also called the cingulo-opercular network, allows voluntary control of behavior in accordance with goals. Individual differences among children in self-regulation have been measured by a higher order factor called effortful control, which is related to the executive network and to the size of the anterior cingulate cortex. SUMMARY: Brain networks of attention arise in infancy and are related to individual differences, including pathology during childhood. Methods of training attention may improve performance and ameliorate pathology.

Indexed as

AttentionBrain MappingChildExecutive FunctionGyrus CinguliHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetNeuronal Plasticity

Identifiers

PMID27552068
PMCPMC5257020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.