Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27551918›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Audiovisual Simultaneity Judgment and Rapid Recalibration throughout the Lifespan.

Jean-Paul Noel, Matthew De Niear, Erik Van der Burg, Mark T Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The rhythm of sensory input shapes audio-visual temporal processing.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. When 2 become 1: Autistic simultaneity judgements about asynchronous audiovisual speech.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. No differences between adults with and without autism in audiovisual synchrony perception.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sensory- and memory-related drivers for altered ventriloquism effects and aftereffects in older adults.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jean-Paul NoelNeuroscience Graduate Program, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-3363
Matthew De NiearVanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, United States of America.
Erik Van der BurgDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark T WallaceVanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, United States of America.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007347 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER S. · 1985 to 2023
$26.3M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Multisensory Processing Across Lifespan and Links to CognitionR21CA183492 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI NEWHOUSE, PAUL A., WALLACE, MARK THOMAS · 2013 to 2014
$416k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA183492NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multisensory interactions are well established to convey an array of perceptual and behavioral benefits. One of the key features of multisensory interactions is the temporal structure of the stimuli combined. In an effort to better characterize how temporal factors influence multisensory interactions across the lifespan, we examined audiovisual simultaneity judgment and the degree of rapid recalibration to paired audiovisual stimuli (Flash-Beep and Speech) in a sample of 220 participants ranging from 7 to 86 years of age. Results demonstrate a surprisingly protracted developmental time-course for both audiovisual simultaneity judgment and rapid recalibration, with neither reaching maturity until well into adolescence. Interestingly, correlational analyses revealed that audiovisual simultaneity judgments (i.e., the size of the audiovisual temporal window of simultaneity) and rapid recalibration significantly co-varied as a function of age. Together, our results represent the most complete description of age-related changes in audiovisual simultaneity judgments to date, as well as being the first to describe changes in the degree of rapid recalibration as a function of age. We propose that the developmental time-course of rapid recalibration scaffolds the maturation of more durable audiovisual temporal representations.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionJudgmentVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27551918
PMCPMC4994953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.