ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2016
Penetrating foreign body in the masticator space with injury to the internal maxillary artery: a surgical challenge.
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Foreign bodies (FBs) in the masticator space (MS) are a unique problem because of the difficulty of accessing this deep compartment within the head and neck. In addition, MS contents include critical structures such as the internal maxillary artery (IMA) and mandibular nerve. CASE HISTORY A 39-year-old tradesman was involved in a construction accident whereby a metallic projectile from a machinery drill penetrated his left cheek. Computed tomography revealed a metallic object of dimension 1.9 ×1.2 cm within the MS, with concomitant fracture of left maxillary anterior and lateral walls. Surgery was indicated in view of constant pain and swelling. The FB was removed through the cheek laceration with the aid of an X-ray image intensifier. Persistent significant bleeding was observed within the wound cavity after FB removal that could not be arrested despite attempts at haemostasis with adrenaline packing and oxidised cellulose polymers. Urgent selective left external carotid angiography showed breach of a distal branch of the left internal maxillary artery with contrast extravasation. Embolisation of this branch was undertaken successfully with a liquid agent. CONCLUSIONS This is the first time a FB within the MS with injury to the internal maxillary artery has been described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.