Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27551882›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug safety2016

Peginesatide for the treatment of anemia due to chronic kidney disease - an unfulfilled promise.

Terhi Hermanson, Charles L Bennett, Iain C Macdougall

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Festschrift in honor of Dr. Jeffrey Hymes.Frontiers in nephrology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Trends in peptide drug discovery.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Updates on Novel Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents: Clinical and Molecular Approach.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Terhi Hermansona Comprehensive Cancer Center , Helsinki University Central Hospital , Helsinki , Finland.
Charles L Bennetta Comprehensive Cancer Center , Helsinki University Central Hospital , Helsinki , Finland.
Iain C Macdougalld Department of Renal Medicine , King's College Hospital , London , UK.
Helsinki University Hospital · FIKing's College Hospital · GBMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Southern Oncology Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR) - Focus on Tyrosine KinaseR01CA165609 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BENNETT, CHARLES L. · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA165609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe introduction of recombinant human erythropoietin revolutionized the management of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In order to circumvent costly recombinant DNA technology, synthetic chemistry techniques were used to manufacture peginesatide, a synthetic peptide that bore no resemblance to previous erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), and yet was capable of stimulating erythropoiesis. Compared with other ESAs, peginesatide was deemed to have advantages related to immunogenicity, administration schedule, and cost. Marketing approval was restricted to CKD patients on dialysis because cardiovascular events were more common with peginesatide than with darbepoetin in non-dialysis CKD patients. Unfortunately, unexplained serious adverse drug reactions (sADR) led to quick withdrawal of peginesatide from the market. AREAS COVERED: This review describes the efficacy and safety of peginesatide in pre-approval clinical trials, sADRs after marketing approval, and lessons learned during its short life-span. EXPERT OPINION: The case of peginesatide illustrates the difficulties in detecting rare sADRs in trials with limited patient populations and the need for improved pharmacovigilance after marketing approval. However, the need for simpler drug production methods as a result of non-dependence on recombinant DNA techniques and mammalian cell lines remains. Lessons learned during the scientific development of peginesatide can be used in developing other drugs.

Indexed as

AnemiaDrug ApprovalHematinicsHumansPeptidesRecombinant ProteinsRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicHematinicspeginesatidePeptidesRecombinant ProteinsAdverse drug reactionsanaphylacticanemiachronic kidney diseasedarbepoetinepoetinerythropoiesis-stimulating agenthemodialysishemoglobinpeginesatidepharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID27551882
PMCPMC5286458
OpenAlexW2513075690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.