Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27551746›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

A Robust Actin Filaments Image Analysis Framework.

Mitchel Alioscha-Perez, Carine Benadiba, Katty Goossens, Sandor Kasas, Giovanni Dietler, Ronnie Willaert, Hichem Sahli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quantifying cytoskeletal organization from optical microscopy data.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Tracing and tracking filamentous structures across scales: A systematic review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mitchel Alioscha-PerezElectronics and Informatics Dept (ETRO), AVSP Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Carine BenadibaVUB-EPFL International Joint Research Group (IJRG) NanoBiotechnology and NanoMedicine (NANO), Brussels, Belgium.
Katty GoossensVUB-EPFL International Joint Research Group (IJRG) NanoBiotechnology and NanoMedicine (NANO), Brussels, Belgium.
Sandor KasasVUB-EPFL International Joint Research Group (IJRG) NanoBiotechnology and NanoMedicine (NANO), Brussels, Belgium.
Giovanni DietlerVUB-EPFL International Joint Research Group (IJRG) NanoBiotechnology and NanoMedicine (NANO), Brussels, Belgium.
Ronnie WillaertVUB-EPFL International Joint Research Group (IJRG) NanoBiotechnology and NanoMedicine (NANO), Brussels, Belgium.
Hichem SahliElectronics and Informatics Dept (ETRO), AVSP Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cytoskeleton is a highly dynamical protein network that plays a central role in numerous cellular physiological processes, and is traditionally divided into three components according to its chemical composition, i.e. actin, tubulin and intermediate filament cytoskeletons. Understanding the cytoskeleton dynamics is of prime importance to unveil mechanisms involved in cell adaptation to any stress type. Fluorescence imaging of cytoskeleton structures allows analyzing the impact of mechanical stimulation in the cytoskeleton, but it also imposes additional challenges in the image processing stage, such as the presence of imaging-related artifacts and heavy blurring introduced by (high-throughput) automated scans. However, although there exists a considerable number of image-based analytical tools to address the image processing and analysis, most of them are unfit to cope with the aforementioned challenges. Filamentous structures in images can be considered as a piecewise composition of quasi-straight segments (at least in some finer or coarser scale). Based on this observation, we propose a three-steps actin filaments extraction methodology: (i) first the input image is decomposed into a 'cartoon' part corresponding to the filament structures in the image, and a noise/texture part, (ii) on the 'cartoon' image, we apply a multi-scale line detector coupled with a (iii) quasi-straight filaments merging algorithm for fiber extraction. The proposed robust actin filaments image analysis framework allows extracting individual filaments in the presence of noise, artifacts and heavy blurring. Moreover, it provides numerous parameters such as filaments orientation, position and length, useful for further analysis. Cell image decomposition is relatively under-exploited in biological images processing, and our study shows the benefits it provides when addressing such tasks. Experimental validation was conducted using publicly available datasets, and in osteoblasts grown in two different conditions: static (control) and fluid shear stress. The proposed methodology exhibited higher sensitivity values and similar accuracy compared to state-of-the-art methods.

Indexed as

ActinsAlgorithmsAnimalsCell LineCytoskeletonImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceStress, MechanicalActins

Identifiers

PMID27551746
PMCPMC4995035
OpenAlexW2508457469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.