Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27551553›Full record

ReviewCentral European journal of urology2016

Prostate MRI - an update for the referring urologist.

Marcin Czarniecki, Maciej Jakuciński, Leszek Królicki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Central European journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcin CzarnieckiBródnowski Mazovian Hospital, Department of Diagnostic, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej JakucińskiBródnowski Mazovian Hospital, Department of Diagnostic, Warsaw, Poland.
Leszek KrólickiBródnowski Mazovian Hospital, Department of Diagnostic, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProstate MRI is a new and important tool which has a role in prostate cancer guidelines worldwide. The amount of articles published and studies currently taking place on the subject requires urologists to understand how the examination is performed and its possible applications. This article explains prostate MRI and standardized reporting schemes, as well as its applications according to patients' staging and history. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe use of prostate MRI prior to biopsy, MRI-guided biopsy and its use in active surveillance, surgery staging and planning, as well as in cases with biochemical recurrence are discussed.

resultsThe application of prostate MRI are not limited to initial diagnosis, but also has a developing role in biopsy and planning further treatment. Recently, its diagnostic applications have been included in EAU prostate cancer guidelines and new applications are in development.

conclusionsPracticing urologists are seeing an emerging role of MRI in prostate cancer. Its current and future applications may have an impact on patient care, which mandates healthcare professionals to be vigilant about the method's new developments.

Indexed as

detectionmpMRIMRIprostatereview

Identifiers

PMID27551553
PMCPMC4986294
OpenAlexW2511519542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.