Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27551445›Full record

ArticleCell death discovery2015

Silencing of RUNX2 enhances gemcitabine sensitivity of p53-deficient human pancreatic cancer AsPC-1 cells through the stimulation of TAp63-mediated cell death.

H Sugimoto, M Nakamura, H Yoda, K Hiraoka, K Shinohara, M Sang, K Fujiwara, O Shimozato, H Nagase, T Ozaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death discovery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. RUNX2 Reverses p53-Induced Chemotherapy Resistance in Gastric Cancer.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. miR-205/RunX2 axis negatively regulates CD44American journal of cancer research · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H SugimotoLaboratory of DNA Damage Signaling, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute , Chuou-ku, Chiba, Japan.
M NakamuraLaboratory of DNA Damage Signaling, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute , Chuou-ku, Chiba, Japan.
H YodaLaboratory of Cancer Genetics, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute , Chuou-ku, Chiba, Japan.
K HiraokaLaboratory of Cancer Genetics, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute , Chuou-ku, Chiba, Japan.
K ShinoharaLaboratory of Cancer Genetics, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute , Chuou-ku, Chiba, Japan.
M SangLaboratory of DNA Damage Signaling, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute , Chuou-ku, Chiba, Japan.
K FujiwaraInnovative Therapy Research Group, Nihon University Research Institute of Medical Science, Nihon University School of Medicine , Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.
O ShimozatoLaboratory of DNA Damage Signaling, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute , Chuou-ku, Chiba, Japan.
H NagaseLaboratory of Cancer Genetics, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute , Chuou-ku, Chiba, Japan.
T OzakiLaboratory of DNA Damage Signaling, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute , Chuou-ku, Chiba, Japan.
Chiba Cancer Center · JPNihon University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) has been considered to be one of master regulators for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Recently, we have described that RUNX2 attenuates p53/TAp73-dependent cell death of human osteosarcoma U2OS cells bearing wild-type p53 in response to adriamycin. In this study, we have asked whether RUNX2 silencing could enhance gemcitabine (GEM) sensitivity of p53-deficient human pancreatic cancer AsPC-1 cells. Under our experimental conditions, GEM treatment increased the expression level of p53 family TAp63, whereas RUNX2 was reduced following GEM exposure, indicating that there exists an inverse relationship between the expression level of TAp63 and RUNX2 following GEM exposure. To assess whether TAp63 could be involved in the regulation of GEM sensitivity of AsPC-1 cells, small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of TAp63 was performed. As expected, silencing of TAp63 significantly prohibited GEM-dependent cell death as compared with GEM-treated non-silencing cells. As TAp63 was negatively regulated by RUNX2, we sought to examine whether RUNX2 knockdown could enhance the sensitivity to GEM. Expression analysis demonstrated that depletion of RUNX2 apparently stimulates the expression of TAp63, as well as proteolytic cleavage of poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) after GEM exposure, and further augmented GEM-mediated induction of p53/TAp63-target genes, such as p21 (WAF1) , PUMA and NOXA, relative to GEM-treated control-transfected cells, implying that RUNX2 has a critical role in the regulation of GEM resistance through the downregulation of TAp63. Notably, ablation of TAp63 gave a decrease in number of γH2AX-positive cells in response to GEM relative to control-transfected cells following GEM exposure. Consistently, GEM-dependent phosphorylation of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated protein was remarkably impaired in TAp63 knockdown cells. Collectively, our present findings strongly suggest that RUNX2-mediated repression of TAp63 contributes at least in part to GEM resistance of AsPC-1 cells, and thus silencing of RUNX2 may be a novel strategy to enhance the efficacy of GEM in p53-deficient pancreatic cancer cells.

Identifiers

PMID27551445
PMCPMC4981025
OpenAlexW2946907457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.