Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27551411›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pain2016

Clinical effectiveness of a residential pain management programme - comparing a large recent sample with previously published outcome data.

Jared G Smith, Lucie Knight, Amy Stewart, Emma L Smith, Lance M McCracken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pain, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jared G SmithPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Lucie KnightINPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Amy StewartINPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Emma L SmithPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Lance M McCrackenINPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveObservational studies using routinely collected data indicate that pain management programmes (PMPs) based on cognitive-behavioural principles are associated with clinically meaningful improvements for individuals with chronic pain. This study evaluated change across functional measures in a sample of chronic pain patients attending a 4-week residential PMP between 2006 and 2010. The findings were directly compared with published outcomes from an earlier period (1989-1998) at the same service.

methodsParticipants included 760 consecutive completers of a multidisciplinary PMP. Data were collected at pre-PMP, post-PMP (1-month post-discharge) and at a 9-month follow-up session. Group-based treatment effects and the reliability and clinical significance of change across functional measures were calculated and compared across cohorts.

resultsEffect sizes for the recent cohort ranged from small to medium (.43-.67) for pain and physical functioning outcomes to large (.90-1.12) for psychological outcomes at post-treatment (n = 654), and from small (.30-.51) to medium (.58-.71) at 9-month follow-up (n = 493). Clinically significant gains on pain and psychological measures were achieved by 19-55% of patients at post-treatment and 17-44% at follow-up. Comparisons with the earlier cohort showed significantly stronger post-treatment outcomes but differences at follow-up were less marked. DISCUSSION: These results add to the evidence base supporting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT)-based pain management interventions. There were significantly larger gains in patient functioning in the recent dataset, suggesting improved programme delivery. But effects were less marked in the longer term, indicating a need for improvements in therapeutic models and related methods to promote meaningful and lasting changes.

Indexed as

Chronic painclinical significanceinterdisciplinarypain management programmereliable change

Identifiers

PMID27551411
PMCPMC4977965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.