ArticleBritish journal of pain2016
Clinical effectiveness of a residential pain management programme - comparing a large recent sample with previously published outcome data.
Article in British journal of pain, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of a veteran-specific pain management programme by remote technology-based delivery: An observational study.British journal of pain · 2026Article
- An updated audit of the patient selection process for pain management programmes in a speciality care service before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.British journal of pain · 2023Article
- A Consideration of the Psychological Aspects to Managing Patients with Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: An Insight into Pain Management Services at a Tertiary Centre in the UK.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021Review
- Self-Medication for Chronic Pain Using Classic Psychedelics: A Qualitative Investigation to Inform Future Research.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Assessment and patient selection process for a pain management programme: a case study in specialty care.British journal of pain · 2019Article
- Analgesic reduction during an interdisciplinary pain management programme: treatment effects and processes of change.British journal of pain · 2018Article
- Assessing physical functioning on pain management programmes: the unique contribution of directly assessed physical performance measures and their relationship to self-reports.British journal of pain · 2017Article
- Getting "Unstuck": A Multi-Site Evaluation of the Efficacy of an Interdisciplinary Pain Intervention Program for Chronic Low Back Pain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveObservational studies using routinely collected data indicate that pain management programmes (PMPs) based on cognitive-behavioural principles are associated with clinically meaningful improvements for individuals with chronic pain. This study evaluated change across functional measures in a sample of chronic pain patients attending a 4-week residential PMP between 2006 and 2010. The findings were directly compared with published outcomes from an earlier period (1989-1998) at the same service.
methodsParticipants included 760 consecutive completers of a multidisciplinary PMP. Data were collected at pre-PMP, post-PMP (1-month post-discharge) and at a 9-month follow-up session. Group-based treatment effects and the reliability and clinical significance of change across functional measures were calculated and compared across cohorts.
resultsEffect sizes for the recent cohort ranged from small to medium (.43-.67) for pain and physical functioning outcomes to large (.90-1.12) for psychological outcomes at post-treatment (n = 654), and from small (.30-.51) to medium (.58-.71) at 9-month follow-up (n = 493). Clinically significant gains on pain and psychological measures were achieved by 19-55% of patients at post-treatment and 17-44% at follow-up. Comparisons with the earlier cohort showed significantly stronger post-treatment outcomes but differences at follow-up were less marked. DISCUSSION: These results add to the evidence base supporting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT)-based pain management interventions. There were significantly larger gains in patient functioning in the recent dataset, suggesting improved programme delivery. But effects were less marked in the longer term, indicating a need for improvements in therapeutic models and related methods to promote meaningful and lasting changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.