Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27551407›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pain2016

Assessing knowledge, perceptions and attitudes to pain management among medical and nursing students: a review of the literature.

Andrew Ung, Yenna Salamonson, Wendy Hu, Gisselle Gallego

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pain, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07129044 (The Effect of the Flipped Classroom Model on Nursing Students' Pediatric Pain Management Knowledge and Learning Motivation), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07129044 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of the Flipped Classroom Model on Nursing Students' Pediatric Pain Management Knowledge and Learning Motivation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMustafa BelliRan2022 to 2022Enrolled84ConditionsPain ManagementArmsFlipped Classroom Training on Pediatric Pain Management, Self-Directed Learning on Pediatric Pain Management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding children's pain assessment and management in Nepal.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Multi-country Comparative Study on Palliative Care Knowledge and Attitudes Toward End-of-Life Care Among Undergraduate Nursing Students.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Opioid Misuse: A Review of the Main Issues, Challenges, and Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew UngSchool of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Yenna SalamonsonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Wendy HuSchool of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Gisselle GallegoSchool of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, NSW, Australia; Centre for Health Research, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic pain results in significant personal, societal and economic burden. Doctors and nurses have a pivotal role in patient pain management. In order to determine the effectiveness of current pain education on knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of medical and nursing students, there needs to be a valid measure to assess and quantify these domains. We reviewed the literature to identify approaches for assessing knowledge, perceptions and attitudes to pain management among nursing and medical students.

methodsDatabases of peer-reviewed literature including CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, PsycInfo, Medline and PubMed were searched for articles published between 1993 and December 2014 using the following search terms: student, graduate, intern, junior, pain, pain management, analgesia, analgesic, pharmacology, pharmacological, knowledge, competence, attitude, preparedness, practice, nursing, medical, doctor, nurse.

resultsThe search revealed over 3500 articles, and on application of the inclusion criteria, 26 articles were included in the review. A total of 14 instruments were used in these studies with the Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP) as the main instrument in 9 out of the 26 articles. The various instruments used different question formats such as multiple-choice questions (MCQs), true/false statements and Likert scales that went from 3 points to 7 points. Clinical skills examinations were also used in four studies to assess pain management.

conclusionThere is no gold standard instrument currently used to assess knowledge, perceptions and attitudes to pain management. The results of this review showed, despite the diversity of standardised instruments that have been used to assess knowledge, perceptions and attitude to pain management, the literature has consistently reported that knowledge about pain management among nursing and medical students was generally poor among both groups.

Indexed as

assessmentknowledgemedical studentsnursing studentsPain management

Identifiers

PMID27551407
PMCPMC4977961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.