Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27551345›Full record

ArticleComparative cytogenetics2016

Cytogenetic data on six leafcutter ants of the genus Acromyrmex Mayr, 1865 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmicinae): insights into chromosome evolution and taxonomic implications.

Luísa Antônia Campos Barros, Hilton Jeferson Alves Cardoso de Aguiar, Cléa Dos Santos Ferreira Mariano, Vanderly Andrade-Souza, Marco Antonio Costa, Jacques Hubert Charles Delabie, Silvia das Graças Pompolo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative cytogenetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luísa Antônia Campos BarrosLaboratório de Citogenética de Insetos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Viçosa - MG, 36570-000, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Amapá; Campus Binacional, Oiapoque - AP, 68980-000, Brazil.
Hilton Jeferson Alves Cardoso de AguiarLaboratório de Citogenética de Insetos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Viçosa - MG, 36570-000, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Amapá; Campus Binacional, Oiapoque - AP, 68980-000, Brazil.
Cléa Dos Santos Ferreira MarianoLaboratório de Mirmecologia, CEPEC/CEPLAC; Itabuna - BA, CP 7, 45600-000, Brazil; Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz; Ilhéus - BA, 45650-000, Brazil.
Vanderly Andrade-SouzaInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; Manaus - AM, 69067-375, Brazil.
Marco Antonio CostaDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz; Ilhéus - BA, 45650-000, Brazil.
Jacques Hubert Charles DelabieLaboratório de Mirmecologia, CEPEC/CEPLAC; Itabuna - BA, CP 7, 45600-000, Brazil; Departamento de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz; Ilhéus - BA, 45650-000, Brazil.
Silvia das Graças PompoloLaboratório de Citogenética de Insetos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; Viçosa - MG, 36570-000, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal de Viçosa · BRInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytogenetic data for the genus Acromyrmex Mayr, 1865 are available, to date, for a few species from Brazil and Uruguay, which have uniform chromosome numbers (2n = 38). The recent cytogenetic data of Acromyrmex striatus (Roger, 1863), including its banding patterns, showed a distinct karyotype (2n = 22), similar to earlier studied Atta Fabricius, 1804 species. Karyological data are still scarce for the leafcutter ants and many gaps are still present for a proper understanding of this group. Therefore, this study aimed at increasing cytogenetic knowledge of the genus through the characterization of other six species: Acromyrmex balzani (Emery, 1890), Acromyrmex coronatus Fabricius, 1804, Acromyrmex disciger (Mayr, 1887), Acromyrmex echinatior (Forel, 1899), Acromyrmex niger (Smith, 1858) and Acromyrmex rugosus (Smith, 1858), all of which were collected in Minas Gerais - Brazil, except for Acromyrmex echinatior which was collected in Barro Colorado - Panama. The number and morphology of the chromosomes were studied and the following banding techniques were applied: C-banding, fluorochromes CMA3 and DAPI, as well as the detection of 45S rDNA using FISH technique. All the six species had the same chromosome number observed for already studied species, i.e. 2n = 38. Acromyrmex balzani had a different karyotype compared with other species mainly due to the first metacentric pair. The heterochromatin distribution also showed interspecific variation. Nevertheless, all the studied species had a pair of bands in the short arm of the first subtelocentric pair. The fluorochrome CMA3 visualized bands in the short arm of the first subtelocentric pair for all the six species, while Acromyrmex rugosus and Acromyrmex niger also demonstrated in the other chromosomes. The AT-rich regions with differential staining using DAPI were not observed. 45S ribosomal genes were identified by FISH in the short arm of the first subtelocentric pair in Acromyrmex coronatus, Acromyrmex disciger and Acromyrmex niger. The uniform chromosome number in the genus Acromyrmex (2n = 38) suggests that Acromyrmex striatus (2n = 22) should be transferred to a new genus. Other aspects of the chromosome evolution in ants are also discussed.

Indexed as

biodiversityChromosome evolutionFISHfungus-growing antsheterochromatinkaryotype

Identifiers

PMID27551345
PMCPMC4977799
OpenAlexW2355599466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.