Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27551265›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2016

Transitioning Pharmacogenomics into the Clinical Setting: Training Future Pharmacists.

Amber Frick, Cristina S Benton, Kelly L Scolaro, Jacqueline E McLaughlin, Courtney L Bradley, Oscar T Suzuki, Nan Wang, Tim Wiltshire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Characteristics and evaluation outcomes of genomics curricula for health professional students: a systematic literature review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Toward Integration of Pharmacogenomic Tests into Daily Clinical Practice: A General Survey for Polish Healthcare Workers.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Emerging Innovations and Professional Skills Needed Within Pharmacy Curricula.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amber FrickDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Cristina S BentonDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kelly L ScolaroPharmacy Practice Department, School of Pharmacy, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine Bradenton, FL, USA.
Jacqueline E McLaughlinDivision of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Courtney L BradleyClinical Science Department, Fred Wilson School of Pharmacy, High Point University High Point, NC, USA.
Oscar T SuzukiDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Nan WangDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Tim WiltshireDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics, once hailed as a futuristic approach to pharmacotherapy, has transitioned to clinical implementation. Although logistic and economic limitations to clinical pharmacogenomics are being superseded by external measures such as preemptive genotyping, implementation by clinicians has met resistance, partly due to a lack of education. Pharmacists, with extensive training in pharmacology and pharmacotherapy and accessibility to patients, are ideally suited to champion clinical pharmacogenomics. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of an innovative pharmacogenomic teaching approach. Second-year student pharmacists enrolled in a required, 15-week pharmaceutical care lab course in 2015 completed educational activities including lectures and small group work focusing on practical pharmacogenomics. Reflecting the current landscape of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing, students were offered 23andMe genotyping. Students completed surveys regarding their attitudes and confidence on pharmacogenomics prior to and following the educational intervention. Paired pre- and post-intervention responses were analyzed with McNemar's test for binary comparisons and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for Likert items. Responses between genotyped and non-genotyped students were analyzed with Fisher's exact test for binary comparisons and the Mann-Whitney U-test for Likert items. Responses were analyzed for all student pharmacists who voluntarily completed the pre-intervention survey (N = 121, 83% response) and for student pharmacists who completed both pre- and post-intervention surveys (N = 39, 27% response). Of those who completed both pre- and post-intervention surveys, 59% obtained genotyping. Student pharmacists demonstrated a significant increase in their knowledge of pharmacogenomic resources (17.9 vs. 56.4%, p < 0.0001) and confidence in applying pharmacogenomic information to manage patients' drug therapy (28.2 vs. 48.7%, p = 0.01), particularly if the student had received genotyping. Student pharmacists understanding of the risks and benefits of using personal genome testing services significantly increased (55.3 vs. 86.8%, p = 0.001) along with agreement that personal genomics would likely play an important role in their future career (47.4 vs. 76.3%, p = 0.01), particularly among students who participated in genotyping. The educational intervention, including personal genotyping, was feasible, and positively enhanced students' reflections, and attitudes toward pharmacogenomics in a professional pharmacy program.

Indexed as

clinical pharmacogenomics implementationdirect-to-consumer personal genotypingpharmacogenomics educationpreemptive genotypingstudent pharmacists

Identifiers

PMID27551265
PMCPMC4976536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.