Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27551076›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Paradoxical signaling regulates structural plasticity in dendritic spines.

Padmini Rangamani, Michael G Levy, Shahid Khan, George Oster

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dynamics and Sensitivity of Signaling Pathways.Current pathobiology reports · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Padmini RangamaniDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; padmini.rangamani@eng.ucsd.edu goster@berkeley.edu.
Michael G LevyBiophysics Graduate Program, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;
Shahid KhanMolecular Biology Consortium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720;
George OsterDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 padmini.rangamani@eng.ucsd.edu goster@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · USMolecular Biology Consortium · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

TR&D4 Spatial Modeling: Modeling Framework for Cell MotilityP41GM103313 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LOEW, LESLIE M · 2012 to 2018
$9.7M
Mathematical models of membrane biophysics and microbial locomotionR01GM104979 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RODERICK, GEORGE KARLSSON · 2012 to 2014
$538k
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103313NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transient spine enlargement (3- to 5-min timescale) is an important event associated with the structural plasticity of dendritic spines. Many of the molecular mechanisms associated with transient spine enlargement have been identified experimentally. Here, we use a systems biology approach to construct a mathematical model of biochemical signaling and actin-mediated transient spine expansion in response to calcium influx caused by NMDA receptor activation. We have identified that a key feature of this signaling network is the paradoxical signaling loop. Paradoxical components act bifunctionally in signaling networks, and their role is to control both the activation and the inhibition of a desired response function (protein activity or spine volume). Using ordinary differential equation (ODE)-based modeling, we show that the dynamics of different regulators of transient spine expansion, including calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), RhoA, and Cdc42, and the spine volume can be described using paradoxical signaling loops. Our model is able to capture the experimentally observed dynamics of transient spine volume. Furthermore, we show that actin remodeling events provide a robustness to spine volume dynamics. We also generate experimentally testable predictions about the role of different components and parameters of the network on spine dynamics.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalActinsAnimalsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2cdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinDendritic SpinesHippocampusHumansNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartaterhoA GTP-Binding ProteinSignal TransductionActinsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2cdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartaterhoA GTP-Binding ProteinactinCaMKIIdendritic spine

Identifiers

PMID27551076
PMCPMC5018790
OpenAlexW2518276547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.