Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27551024›Full record

ReviewArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2016

Assessment of Healthcare Decision-making Capacity.

Barton W Palmer, Alexandrea L Harmell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Enhancing Advance Care Planning in India through a 12-step Pathway.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  15. High-Risk Patient Refusals in the Prehospital Setting-Clinical and Legal Considerations.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Standardised capacity measures and cognition in the assessment of capacity in children and adolescents: a systematic review.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2025
    Article
  18. Age-bias in assessments of medical decision-making capacity: a cross-sectional experimental vignette study.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barton W PalmerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA Veterans Medical Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA Center for Healthy Aging/Stein Institute for Research on Aging, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA bpalmer@ucsd.edu.
Alexandrea L HarmellDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA Center for Healthy Aging/Stein Institute for Research on Aging, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology , San Diego, CA, USA.
Institute on Aging · USVA San Diego Healthcare System · US

Funding

FELLOWSHIP IN GERIATRIC MENTAL HEALTHT32MH019934 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Elizabeth W Twamley · 1994 to 2026
$9.5M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is often necessary for neuropsychologists, clinical psychologists, and other healthcare professionals to assess an individual's capacity to consent to treatment related to healthcare. This task can be challenging and requires a delicate balance of both respect for individuals' autonomy, as well as the protection of individuals with diminished capacity to make an autonomous decision. The purpose of the present review is to provide an overview of the conceptual model of decisional capacity as well as a brief summary of some of the currently available instruments designed to help evaluate medical decision making. In addition, current empirical literature on the relationship between neuropsychological abilities and decision-making capacity is discussed and a brief set of recommendations is provided to further aid clinicians or consultants when they are required to complete the ethically important but difficult task of making determinations about healthcare decision-making capacity.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDementiaModels, PsychologicalDecision MakingHumansNeuropsychological TestsAlzheimer's diseaseAssessmentSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID27551024
PMCPMC5007079
OpenAlexW2518041136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.