Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27551019›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2016

Circuitry Linking the Catabolite Repression and Csr Global Regulatory Systems of Escherichia coli.

Archana Pannuri, Christopher A Vakulskas, Tesfalem Zere, Louise C McGibbon, Adrianne N Edwards, Dimitris Georgellis, Paul Babitzke, Tony Romeo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sugar Import SuppressesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multitier regulation of theJournal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  9. CsrA Shows Selective Regulation of sRNA-mRNA Networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Battle for Metals: Regulatory RNAs at the Front Line.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Archana PannuriDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Christopher A VakulskasDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Tesfalem ZereDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Louise C McGibbonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for RNA Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Adrianne N EdwardsDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Dimitris GeorgellisDepartamento de Genética Molecular, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Paul BabitzkeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for RNA Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tony RomeoDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville, Florida, USA tromeo@ufl.edu.
University of Florida · USPennsylvania State University · USEmory University · USUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

Mechanism of CsrA-mediated global regulationR01GM059969 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI BABITZKE, PAUL L, ROMEO, TONY · 1999 to 2021
$7.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclic AMP (cAMP) and the cAMP receptor protein (cAMP-CRP) and CsrA are the principal regulators of the catabolite repression and carbon storage global regulatory systems, respectively. cAMP-CRP controls the transcription of genes for carbohydrate metabolism and other processes in response to carbon nutritional status, while CsrA binds to diverse mRNAs and regulates translation, RNA stability, and/or transcription elongation. CsrA also binds to the regulatory small RNAs (sRNAs) CsrB and CsrC, which antagonize its activity. The BarA-UvrY two-component signal transduction system (TCS) directly activates csrB and csrC (csrB/C) transcription, while CsrA does so indirectly. We show that cAMP-CRP inhibits csrB/C transcription without negatively regulating phosphorylated UvrY (P-UvrY) or CsrA levels. A crp deletion caused an elevation in CsrB/C levels in the stationary phase of growth and increased the expression of csrB-lacZ and csrC-lacZ transcriptional fusions, although modest stimulation of CsrB/C turnover by the crp deletion partially masked the former effects. DNase I footprinting and other studies demonstrated that cAMP-CRP bound specifically to three sites located upstream from the csrC promoter, two of which overlapped the P-UvrY binding site. These two proteins competed for binding at the overlapping sites. In vitro transcription-translation experiments confirmed direct repression of csrC-lacZ expression by cAMP-CRP. In contrast, cAMP-CRP effects on csrB transcription may be mediated indirectly, as it bound nonspecifically to csrB DNA. In the reciprocal direction, CsrA bound to crp mRNA with high affinity and specificity and yet exhibited only modest, conditional effects on expression. Our findings are incorporated into an emerging model for the response of Csr circuitry to carbon nutritional status. IMPORTANCE: Csr (Rsm) noncoding small RNAs (sRNAs) CsrB and CsrC of Escherichia coli use molecular mimicry to sequester the RNA binding protein CsrA (RsmA) away from lower-affinity mRNA targets, thus eliciting major shifts in the bacterial lifestyle. CsrB/C transcription and turnover are activated by carbon metabolism products (e.g., formate and acetate) and by a preferred carbon source (glucose), respectively. We show that cAMP-CRP, a mediator of classical catabolite repression, inhibits csrC transcription by binding to the upstream region of this gene and also inhibits csrB transcription, apparently indirectly. We propose that glucose availability activates pathways for both synthesis and turnover of CsrB/C, thus shaping the dynamics of global signaling in response to the nutritional environment by poising CsrB/C sRNA levels for rapid response.

Indexed as

Catabolite RepressionGene Expression Regulation, BacterialCyclic AMP Receptor ProteinEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsRepressor ProteinsRNA, BacterialRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Long NoncodingCsrA protein, E coliCsrB RNA, E coliCsrC RNA, E coliCyclic AMP Receptor ProteinEscherichia coli ProteinsRepressor ProteinsRNA, BacterialRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID27551019
PMCPMC5055604
OpenAlexW2510104939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.