Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27550954›Full record

Trial reportPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2017

Abuse Potential Study of ALO-02 (Extended-Release Oxycodone Surrounding Sequestered Naltrexone) Compared with Immediate-Release Oxycodone Administered Orally to Nondependent Recreational Opioid Users.

Beatrice Setnik, Almasa Bass, Candace Bramson, Naama Levy-Cooperman, Bimal Malhotra, Kyle Matschke, Pierre Geoffroy, Kenneth W Sommerville, Gernot Wolfram

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Beatrice SetnikGlobal Product Development, Global Innovative Pharma - Neuroscience & Pain, Pfizer Inc, Durham, NC, USA.
Almasa BassGlobal Product Development, Global Innovative Pharma - Clinical Sciences, Pfizer Inc, Durham, NC, USA.
Candace BramsonGlobal Product Development, Global Innovative Pharma - Clinical Sciences, Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.
Naama Levy-CoopermanEarly Phase, INC Research LLC, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bimal MalhotraGlobal Product Development, Global Innovative Pharma - Clinical Pharmacology, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Kyle MatschkeGlobal Product Development, Global Innovative Pharma - Statistics, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, USA.
Pierre GeoffroyEarly Phase, INC Research LLC, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kenneth W SommervilleGlobal Product Development, Global Innovative Pharma - Neuroscience & Pain, Pfizer Inc, Durham, NC, USA.
Gernot WolframGlobal Product Development, Global Innovative Pharma - Neuroscience & Pain, Pfizer Inc, Durham, NC, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the abuse potential of ALO-02, an abuse-deterrent formulation comprising pellets of extended-release oxycodone hydrochloride surrounding sequestered naltrexone hydrochloride. Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-/active-controlled, 6-way crossover study, with naloxone challenge, drug discrimination, and treatment phases. Subjects: Nondependent, recreational opioid users. Methods: Oral administration of crushed and intact ALO-02, crushed immediate-release (IR) oxycodone, and placebo. Primary endpoints were Drug Liking and High measured on visual analog scales and reported as maximum effect (E max ) and area-under-the-effect-curve from 0 to 2 hours (AUE 0-2h ). Other pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were included. Results: Drug Liking and High (E max ) for crushed oxycodone IR 40 mg were significantly higher compared with placebo, confirming study validity ( P  < 0.0001). Drug Liking and High (E max, AUE 0-2h ) for crushed ALO-02 (40 mg/4.8 mg and 60 mg/7.2 mg) were significantly lower compared to corresponding doses of crushed oxycodone IR (40 and 60 mg; P  < 0.0001). Likewise, Drug Liking and High (E max and AUE 0-2h ) for intact ALO-02 60 mg/7.2 mg were significantly lower compared with crushed oxycodone IR 60 mg ( P  < 0.0001). Secondary pharmacodynamic endpoints and plasma concentrations of oxycodone and naltrexone were consistent with these results. Fewer participants experienced adverse events (AEs) after ALO-02 (crushed or intact: 71.1-91.9%) compared with crushed oxycodone IR (100%). Most common AEs following crushed ALO-02 and oxycodone IR were euphoric mood, pruritus, somnolence, and dizziness. Conclusions: The results suggest that ALO-02 (crushed or intact) has lower abuse potential than crushed oxycodone IR when administered orally in nondependent, recreational opioid users.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsAdministration, OralAnalgesics, OpioidCross-Over StudiesDelayed-Action PreparationsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersOxycodoneAnalgesics, OpioidDelayed-Action PreparationsIllicit DrugsNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOxycodoneAbuse DeterrentAbuse PotentialALO-02OpioidsOxycodone

Identifiers

PMID27550954
PMCPMC5914361
OpenAlexW2511092920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.