ArticleBiofabrication2016
Differences in time-dependent mechanical properties between extruded and molded hydrogels.
Article in Biofabrication, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Candidate Bioinks for Extrusion 3D Bioprinting-A Systematic Review of the Literature.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Pooled it
- Hydrogels for Bioprinting: A Systematic Review of Hydrogels Synthesis, Bioprinting Parameters, and Bioprinted Structures Behavior.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Pooled it
- Exploring the Rheological Properties of 3D Bioprinted Alginate-Based Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- 3D Bioprinting: A Systematic Review for Future Research Direction.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Multilayer 3D bioprinting and complex mechanical properties of alginate-gelatin mesostructures.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The orthotropic viscoelastic characterisation of sub-zero 3D-printed poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogel.MRS advances · 2021Article
- Extrusion-Based Bioprinting: Current Standards and Relevancy for Human-Sized Tissue Fabrication.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020Article
- 3D bioprinting of functional tissue models for personalized drug screening and in vitro disease modeling.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2018Review
- Recent Advances in Extrusion-Based 3D Printing for Biomedical Applications.Advanced healthcare materials · 2018Review
- Advances in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering: Innovation and Transformation of Medicine.Stem cells international · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanical properties of hydrogels used in biomaterials and tissue engineering applications are critical determinants of their functionality. Despite the recent rise of additive manufacturing, and specifically extrusion-based bioprinting, as a prominent biofabrication method, comprehensive studies investigating the mechanical behavior of extruded constructs remain lacking. To address this gap in knowledge, we compared the mechanical properties and swelling properties of crosslinked gelatin-based hydrogels prepared by conventional molding techniques or by 3D bioprinting using a BioBots Beta pneumatic extruder. A preliminary characterization of the impact of bioprinting parameters on construct properties revealed that both Young's modulus and optimal extruding pressure increased with polymer content, and that printing resolution increased with both printing speed and nozzle gauge. High viability (>95%) of encapsulated NIH 3T3 fibroblasts confirmed the cytocompatibility of the construct preparation process. Interestingly, the Young's moduli of extruded and molded constructs were not different, but extruded constructs did show increases in both the rate and extent of time-dependent mechanical behavior observed in creep. Despite similar polymer densities, extruded hydrogels showed greater swelling over time compared to molded hydrogels, suggesting that differences in creep behavior derived from differences in microstructure and fluid flow. Because of the crucial roles of time-dependent mechanical properties, fluid flow, and swelling properties on tissue and cell behavior, these findings highlight the need for greater consideration of the effects of the extrusion process on hydrogel properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.