Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27550904›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2016

The Effects of Population Size Histories on Estimates of Selection Coefficients from Time-Series Genetic Data.

Ethan M Jewett, Matthias Steinrücken, Yun S Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Scaling the Discrete-time Wright Fisher model to biobank-scale datasets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Quantifying Selection with Pool-Seq Time Series Data.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ethan M JewettDepartment of EECS, University of California, Berkeley, CA Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Matthias SteinrückenDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
Yun S SongDepartment of EECS, University of California, Berkeley, CA Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA Department of Mathematics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA yss@berkeley.edu.

Funding

Mathematical Models and Statistical Methods for Large-Scale Population GenomicsR01GM094402 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SONG, YUN S · 2010 to 2018
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many approaches have been developed for inferring selection coefficients from time series data while accounting for genetic drift. These approaches have been motivated by the intuition that properly accounting for the population size history can significantly improve estimates of selective strengths. However, the improvement in inference accuracy that can be attained by modeling drift has not been characterized. Here, by comparing maximum likelihood estimates of selection coefficients that account for the true population size history with estimates that ignore drift by assuming allele frequencies evolve deterministically in a population of infinite size, we address the following questions: how much can modeling the population size history improve estimates of selection coefficients? How much can mis-inferred population sizes hurt inferences of selection coefficients? We conduct our analysis under the discrete Wright-Fisher model by deriving the exact probability of an allele frequency trajectory in a population of time-varying size and we replicate our results under the diffusion model. For both models, we find that ignoring drift leads to estimates of selection coefficients that are nearly as accurate as estimates that account for the true population history, even when population sizes are small and drift is high. This result is of interest because inference methods that ignore drift are widely used in evolutionary studies and can be many orders of magnitude faster than methods that account for population sizes.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticSelection, GeneticBiological EvolutionComputer SimulationGene FrequencyGenetic DriftGenetics, PopulationLikelihood FunctionsPopulation Densitydiffusioninferenceselectiontime seriesWright–Fisher

Identifiers

PMID27550904
PMCPMC5062326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.