Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27550819›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2016

Engineered T cells: the promise and challenges of cancer immunotherapy.

Andrew D Fesnak, Carl H June, Bruce L Levine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 594 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
594citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

594 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Adaptive resistance in cancer immunotherapy.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nanotechnology Meets Immunotherapy: Crosstalks Against Cancer.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026
    Review
  17. Adoptive T-cell therapies in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

534 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew D FesnakDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-5156, USA.
Carl H JuneDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-5156, USA.
Bruce L LevineDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Center for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-5156, USA.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert H. Vonderheide · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL007775 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SIEGEL, DONALD LAWRENCE · 1993 to 2023
$2.8M
IMMUNOTHERAPY WITH CAR T CELLSR01CA120409 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JUNE, CARL H., ZHAO, YANGBING · 2006 to 2016
$2.7M
CD19 Directed CAR TherapyR01CA165206 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JUNE, CARL H., PORTER, DAVID L · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120409NCI NIH HHS R01 CA165206NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immune system evolved to distinguish non-self from self to protect the organism. As cancer is derived from our own cells, immune responses to dysregulated cell growth present a unique challenge. This is compounded by mechanisms of immune evasion and immunosuppression that develop in the tumour microenvironment. The modern genetic toolbox enables the adoptive transfer of engineered T cells to create enhanced anticancer immune functions where natural cancer-specific immune responses have failed. Genetically engineered T cells, so-called 'living drugs', represent a new paradigm in anticancer therapy. Recent clinical trials using T cells engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) or engineered T cell receptors (TCRs) have produced stunning results in patients with relapsed or refractory haematological malignancies. In this Review we describe some of the most recent and promising advances in engineered T cell therapy with a particular emphasis on what the next generation of T cell therapy is likely to entail.

Indexed as

Antigen PresentationAntigens, CD19Antigens, NeoplasmClinical Trials as TopicCostimulatory and Inhibitory T-Cell ReceptorsCytokinesForecastingGene EditingGenetic EngineeringGene Transfer TechniquesHematologic NeoplasmsHLA AntigensHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveModels, ImmunologicalNeoplasmsAntigens, CD19Antigens, NeoplasmCD19 molecule, humanCostimulatory and Inhibitory T-Cell ReceptorsCytokinesHLA AntigensReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27550819
PMCPMC5543811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.