Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27550750›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2016

Traditional Breast Cancer Risk Factors in Filipina Americans Compared with Chinese and Japanese Americans in Los Angeles County.

Anna H Wu, Cheryl Vigen, Eunjung Lee, Chiu-Chen Tseng, Lesley M Butler

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna H WuKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. anna.wu@med.usc.edu.
Cheryl VigenKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Eunjung LeeKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Chiu-Chen TsengKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Lesley M ButlerCancer Control and Population Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Southern California · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Fumito Ito · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
SURVEILLANCE EPIDEMIOLOGY AND END RESULTSN01CN025403 · CN · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ROSS, RONALD K · 1992 to 1996
–
NCI NIH HHS N01 CN025403NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFilipina Americans have one of the highest breast cancer incidence rates among Asian Americans for poorly understood reasons.

methodsBreast cancer risk factors were investigated in a population-based study of Filipina (790 cases, 587 controls), Japanese (543 cases, 510 controls), and Chinese (913 cases, 904 controls) Americans. Cases were identified by the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program, and controls were matched to cases on age, ethnicity, and neighborhood. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was performed by Asian ethnicity.

resultsIn Filipina, Chinese, and Japanese Americans, breast cancer risk decreased significantly with increasing parity (all P

conclusionsCumulative menstrual months and body size factors were statistically significant risk factors for Filipina. Total menstrual months were associated with breast cancer among Chinese but not for Japanese, while body size factors were significantly associated with risk among Japanese but not among Chinese. IMPACT: Characterization of breast cancer risk factors in Filipina will help to generate hypotheses for their high breast cancer incidence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(12); 1572-86. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

AsianBody Mass IndexParityAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesChinaFemaleHumansIncidenceJapanLos AngelesMiddle AgedPhilippinesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID27550750
PMCPMC5135595
OpenAlexW2512362552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.