Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27550293›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2017

Knowledge, opinions and practices of French general practitioners in the assessment of caries risk: results of a national survey.

Sophie Doméjean, Stéphanie Léger, Antoine Simon, Nadège Boucharel, Christopher Holmgren

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie DoméjeanCHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Odontologie, Hôtel-Dieu, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand; Univ Clermont1, UFR d'Odontologie; Centre de Recherche en Odontologie Clinique EA 4847, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France. sophie.domejean@udamail.fr.
Stéphanie LégerDépartement de Mathématiques, Univ Blaise Pascal, F-63177, Aubière, France.
Antoine SimonCHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Odontologie, Hôtel-Dieu, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand; Univ Clermont1, UFR d'Odontologie; Centre de Recherche en Odontologie Clinique EA 4847, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Nadège BoucharelCHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Odontologie, Hôtel-Dieu, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand; Univ Clermont1, UFR d'Odontologie; Centre de Recherche en Odontologie Clinique EA 4847, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Christopher HolmgrenAide Odontologique Internationale, Montrouge, France.
Université Clermont Auvergne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRLaboratoire de Mathématiques d'Orsay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to describe the knowledge, opinions and practices of French general dental practitioners with respect to caries risk assessment (CRA) through the use of a national questionnaire survey. MATERIALS AND

methodsA postal questionnaire survey was applied to a simple random sample of dentists (n = 2000) in France. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed.

resultsThe response rate was 34.7 %. Of the respondents, 38.4 % reported that CRA was not part of their routine practice. Among those who claimed to use CRA only 4.5 % did so using a specific evaluation form. Responses showed that there is great variation among respondents with respect to the importance given to different factors to be considered for the development of a treatment plan in adults. Moreover, 32.3 % of respondents reported no regular scheduling of preventive care based on the caries risk of their patients. Nearly 12 % of respondents admitted they did not know exactly what minimal intervention in caries management involved. The results also showed that socio-demographic characteristics of the practitioner influence the use of CRA and other practice patterns.

conclusionsCRA has not widely entered clinical practice in France. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study, the first of its nature in France, shows the need to develop the use of CRA in daily dental practice in France.

Indexed as

General Practice, DentalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultDental CariesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesCaries risk assessmentDentistsFranceMinimal intervention dentistryPractice patternsQuestionnaire survey

Identifiers

PMID27550293
OpenAlexW2508561596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.