ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2017
Urinary L-FABP as a marker of vesicoureteral reflux in children: could it also have a protective effect on the kidney?
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The value of procalcitonin and urinary NGAL in the prediction of acute pyelonephritis and kidney scarring in pediatric patients with a history of febrile urinary tract infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Pooled it
- Biomarkers and Their Association with Kidney Scarring After the First Episode of Febrile Urinary Tract Infection or Vesicoureteral Reflux in Pediatric Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Urinary L-FABP as a Tubular Damage Marker in Pediatric Neurogenic Bladder-A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLiver-type fatty acid-binding protein is a small cytoplasmic protein which is expressed in the human renal proximal tubular epithelium and synthesized in response to renal tubular injury. The aim of the present study was to investigate the importance of urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein levels in children who diagnosed with vesicoureteral reflux.
methodsFifty-six patients with vesicoureteral reflux and 51 healthy controls were enrolled to the study. The cases were divided into three groups as follows: group A-the controls, group B-the patients who had renal parenchymal scarring and group C-the patients who had no scarring. Urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Creatinine was measured by modified Jaffe method, protein was measured by turbidimetric method, and urine density was determined by using the "falling drop" procedure.
resultsUrinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein and urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein/creatinine levels were significantly higher in the whole patient group than in the controls (p = 0.016, 0.006). Significant differences were also determined by comparing the three groups (p = 0.015, 0.014), and those levels were found as significantly higher in group C.
conclusionUrinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein was considered to be helpful for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux, and also it might contribute to understand the mechanisms causing scar tissue formation especially for the patients who had vesicoureteral reflux. Further clinical and experimental investigations are required to elucidate in detail the physiology of liver-type fatty acid-binding protein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.