Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27550072›Full record

ArticleThe breast journal2016

The Role of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment and Surgical Treatment of Interval and Screen-Detected Breast Cancer in Older Women.

Martha E Goodrich, Julie Weiss, Tracy Onega, Steve L Balch, Diana S M Buist, Karla Kerlikowske, Louise M Henderson, Rebecca A Hubbard, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The breast journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martha E GoodrichDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Julie WeissDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Tracy OnegaDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Steve L BalchGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Diana S M BuistGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Karla KerlikowskeDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Louise M HendersonDepartment of Radiology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Rebecca A HubbardGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium

Funding

Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Diana L Miglioretti · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
Vermont Screening Process Documentation UnitU54CA163303 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI SPRAGUE, BRIAN L · 2011 to 2017
$6.4M
STRATEGIC STUDIES IN BREAST CANCER SURVEILLANCEU01CA086082 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ONEGA, TRACY · 2000 to 2011
$4.9M
Effectiveness of Pre-Operative MRI in Breast Cancer Surgery and OutcomesR01CA149365 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ONEGA, TRACY · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201100031CNCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149365NCI NIH HHS U01 CA086082NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the relationship between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the utilization of additional imaging, biopsy, and primary surgical treatment for subgroups of women with interval versus screen-detected breast cancer. We determined the proportion of women receiving additional breast imaging or biopsy and type of primary surgical treatment, stratified by use of preoperative MRI, separately for both groups. Using Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) data, we identified a cohort of women age 66 and older with an interval or screen-detected breast cancer diagnosis between 2005 and 2010. Using logistic regression, we explored associations between primary surgical treatment type and preoperative MRI use for interval and screen-detected cancers. There were 204 women with an interval cancer and 1,254 with a screen-detected cancer. The interval cancer group was more likely to receive preoperative MRI (21% versus 13%). In both groups, women receiving MRI were more likely to receive additional imaging and/or biopsy. Receipt of MRI was not associated with increased odds of mastectomy (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.67-1.50), while interval cancer diagnosis was associated with significantly higher odds of mastectomy (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.11-2.42). Older women with interval cancer were more likely than women with a screen-detected cancer to have preoperative MRI, however, those with an interval cancer had 64% higher odds of mastectomy regardless of receipt of MRI. Given women with interval cancer are reported to have a worse prognosis, more research is needed to understand effectiveness of imaging modalities and treatment consequences within this group.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMass ScreeningMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalPreoperative Carebreast cancerbreast surgeryinterval breast cancerpreoperative MRI

Identifiers

PMID27550072
PMCPMC5118086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.