ReviewGlobalization and health2016
Influential journals in health research: a bibliometric study.
Review in Globalization and health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Status and trends in transcranial magnetic stimulation research: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Emerging trends and thematic evolution of immunotherapy for glioma based on the top 100 cited articles.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Natural Products for Hyperuricemia: A Bibliometric Analysis (2004-2026).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Energy expenditure and dietary intake in research: A visualization analysis.Nutrition and health · 2026Review
- Approaches to Studying Religion and Public Health: A Narrative Review and Interdisciplinary Framework.Journal of religion and health · 2025Review
- Astigmatism research and application of vector method of the last half century: a bibliometric and visualized analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Knowledge mapping of immunotherapy for breast cancer: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2022.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Review
- Global trends in oxidative stress in the Retina: A bibliometric analysis of 2013-2023.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Bibliometric Trends and Thematic Areas in Research on Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome in Children: A Comprehensive Review.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2024Review
- Collision of herbal medicine and nanotechnology: a bibliometric analysis of herbal nanoparticles from 2004 to 2023.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Research hotspots and trends of epigenetic therapy in oncology: a bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2023.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Top 100 most-cited articles on tau protein: a bibliometric analysis and evidence mapping.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Knowledge mapping of exercise and physical activity research in older adults: Hotspots, bursts, and trends of the last decade.Heliyon · 2023Article
- The 50 most-cited articles in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.Shoulder & elbow · 2023Article
- The 50 most influential publications in clavicle fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Review
- A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Most Influential Studies on Robotic Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2023Article
- Upsurge in publications on ramp lesions of the meniscus: A bibliometric study.Knee surgery & related research · 2023Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 50 Most Cited Studies on Achilles Tendon Pathology.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Bibliometric and visualization analysis of kidney repair associated with acute kidney injury from 2002 to 2022.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Hot spots and frontiers in bone-tendon interface research: a bibliometric analysis and visualization from 2000 to 2023.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a wide range of intellectual work written about health research, which has been shaped by the evolution of diseases. This study aims to identify the leading journals over the last 25 years (1990-2014) according to a wide range of bibliometric indicators.
methodsThe study develops a bibliometric overview of all the journals that are currently indexed in Web of Science (WoS) database in any of the four categories connected to health research. The work classifies health research in nine subfields: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Management and Economics, Health Promotion and Health Behavior, Epidemiology, Health Policy and Services, Medicine, Health Informatics, Engineering and Technology, and Primary Care.
resultsThe results indicate a wide dispersion between categories being the American Journal of Epidemiology, Environmental Health Perspectives, American Journal of Public Health, and Social Science & Medicine, the journals that have received the highest number of citations over the last 25 years. According to other indicators such as the h-index and the citations per paper, some other journals such as the Annual Review of Public Health and Medical Care, obtain better results which show the wide diversity and profiles of outlets available in the scientific community. The results are grouped and studied according to the nine subfields in order to identify the leading journals in each specific sub discipline of health.
conclusionsThe work identifies the leading journals in health research through a bibliometric approach. The analysis shows a deep overview of the results of health journals. It is worth noting that many journals have entered the WoS database during the last years, in many cases to fill some specific niche that has emerged in the literature, although the most popular ones have been in the database for a long time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.