ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2016
[Infected osteosynthesis].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insights into treatment and outcome of fracture-related infection: a systematic literature review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Advantages in orthopaedic implant infection diagnostics by additional analysis of explants.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Article
- [The significance of biofilm for the treatment of infections in orthopedic surgery : 2017 Update].Der Unfallchirurg · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfections after osteosynthesis are a feared complication of the surgical treatment of fractures and should be dealt with by a multidisciplinary team. In addition to the surgeon, also included in this multidisciplinary team are a specialist for infectious diseases, a microbiologist, a radiologist and often a plastic surgeon. This review article describes the current knowledge on the pathogenesis, diagnostics, classification and treatment. The aim is to demonstrate some basic rules in the treatment of infections associated with implants and to show potential therpeutic approaches. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe principles of diagnostics and combined surgical and antibiotic treatment are presented based on the current specialist literature.
resultsWith the help of a team approach the goals of treatment of an infected osteosynthesis, i.e. fracture healing, return to function and eradication of infection can be achieved. While the osteosynthesis material can usually be retained in acute infections, it is better to remove the infected hardware in chronic infections as eradication of the mature biofilm is no longer possible. DISCUSSION: With adequate local wound débridement, the use of local and systemic antibiotics, as indicated by the specialist for infectious diseases and appropriate soft tissue coverage and wound closure, acute as well as chronic infections can be successfully treated. Nowadays, the surgeon has many different options for the management of bone defects. Depending on the anatomical location and the size of the defect a variety of techniques ranging from acute shortening to the Masquelet technique up to the Ilizarov distraction technique are available. These techniques should be combined with local bactericidal treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.