Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27550042›Full record

ArticleBiology direct2016

Tracking the evolution of cancer cell populations through the mathematical lens of phenotype-structured equations.

Tommaso Lorenzi, Rebecca H Chisholm, Jean Clairambault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology direct, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A modelling framework for cancer ecology and evolution.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tommaso LorenziSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9SS, UK. tl47@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9165-1666
Rebecca H ChisholmSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, NSW, Sydney, 2052, Australia.
Jean ClairambaultINRIA Paris Research Centre, MAMBA team, 2, rue Simone Iff, CS 42112, Paris Cedex 12, 75589, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA thorough understanding of the ecological and evolutionary mechanisms that drive the phenotypic evolution of neoplastic cells is a timely and key challenge for the cancer research community. In this respect, mathematical modelling can complement experimental cancer research by offering alternative means of understanding the results of in vitro and in vivo experiments, and by allowing for a quick and easy exploration of a variety of biological scenarios through in silico studies.

resultsTo elucidate the roles of phenotypic plasticity and selection pressures in tumour relapse, we present here a phenotype-structured model of evolutionary dynamics in a cancer cell population which is exposed to the action of a cytotoxic drug. The analytical tractability of our model allows us to investigate how the phenotype distribution, the level of phenotypic heterogeneity, and the size of the cell population are shaped by the strength of natural selection, the rate of random epimutations, the intensity of the competition for limited resources between cells, and the drug dose in use.

conclusionsOur analytical results clarify the conditions for the successful adaptation of cancer cells faced with environmental changes. Furthermore, the results of our analyses demonstrate that the same cell population exposed to different concentrations of the same cytotoxic drug can take different evolutionary trajectories, which culminate in the selection of phenotypic variants characterised by different levels of drug tolerance. This suggests that the response of cancer cells to cytotoxic agents is more complex than a simple binary outcome, i.e., extinction of sensitive cells and selection of highly resistant cells. Also, our mathematical results formalise the idea that the use of cytotoxic agents at high doses can act as a double-edged sword by promoting the outgrowth of drug resistant cellular clones. Overall, our theoretical work offers a formal basis for the development of anti-cancer therapeutic protocols that go beyond the 'maximum-tolerated-dose paradigm', as they may be more effective than traditional protocols at keeping the size of cancer cell populations under control while avoiding the expansion of drug tolerant clones. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Angela Pisco, Sébastien Benzekry and Heiko Enderling.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPhenotypeAdaptation, PhysiologicalBiological EvolutionEnvironmentHumansMutationNeoplasmsCancer cell populationsCytotoxic-drug resistanceEpimutationsMathematical oncologyNatural selectionPhenotype plasticityPhenotype-structured equationsPhenotypic evolutionPhenotypic heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID27550042
PMCPMC4994266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.