Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27549930›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

3D microtumors in vitro supported by perfused vascular networks.

Agua Sobrino, Duc T T Phan, Rupsa Datta, Xiaolin Wang, Stephanie J Hachey, Mónica Romero-López, Enrico Gratton, Abraham P Lee, Steven C George, Christopher C W Hughes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 210 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
210citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

210 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 378 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Advances in Engineering Human Tissue Models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

150 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Agua SobrinoDepartment of Molecular Biology &Biochemistry, UC Irvine, CA, USA.
Duc T T PhanDepartment of Molecular Biology &Biochemistry, UC Irvine, CA, USA.
Rupsa DattaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, UC Irvine, CA, USA.
Xiaolin WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, UC Irvine, CA, USA.
Stephanie J HacheyDepartment of Molecular Biology &Biochemistry, UC Irvine, CA, USA.
Mónica Romero-LópezDepartment of Molecular Biology &Biochemistry, UC Irvine, CA, USA.
Enrico GrattonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, UC Irvine, CA, USA.
Abraham P LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, UC Irvine, CA, USA.
Steven C GeorgeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, MO, USA.
Christopher C W HughesDepartment of Molecular Biology &Biochemistry, UC Irvine, CA, USA.
University of California, Irvine · USFluorescence Innovations (United States) · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
Linking DDR2 expression, the cancer-associated fibroblast, and angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironmentUH3TR000481 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGE, STEVEN CARL · 2014 to 2016
$2.8M
An integrated in vitro model of perfused tumor and cardiac tissueUH2TR000481 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GEORGE, STEVEN CARL · 2012 to 2013
$1.6M
A 3-D In Vitro Platform of Tumor Metastasis (PQ24)R01CA170879 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGE, STEVEN CARL · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
(PQD5) Development of in Vitro Vascularized Microtumors for Drug ScreeningR01CA180122 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI HUGHES, CHRISTOPHER C. W. · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UH2 TR000481NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000481NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170879NCI NIH HHS R01 CA180122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing interest in developing microphysiological systems that can be used to model both normal and pathological human organs in vitro. This "organs-on-chips" approach aims to capture key structural and physiological characteristics of the target tissue. Here we describe in vitro vascularized microtumors (VMTs). This "tumor-on-a-chip" platform incorporates human tumor and stromal cells that grow in a 3D extracellular matrix and that depend for survival on nutrient delivery through living, perfused microvessels. Both colorectal and breast cancer cells grow vigorously in the platform and respond to standard-of-care therapies, showing reduced growth and/or regression. Vascular-targeting agents with different mechanisms of action can also be distinguished, and we find that drugs targeting only VEGFRs (Apatinib and Vandetanib) are not effective, whereas drugs that target VEGFRs, PDGFR and Tie2 (Linifanib and Cabozantinib) do regress the vasculature. Tumors in the VMT show strong metabolic heterogeneity when imaged using NADH Fluorescent Lifetime Imaging Microscopy and, compared to their surrounding stroma, many show a higher free/bound NADH ratio consistent with their known preference for aerobic glycolysis. The VMT platform provides a unique model for studying vascularized solid tumors in vitro.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesModels, BiologicalNeovascularization, PathologicAngiogenesis InhibitorsFemaleHumansMaleMCF-7 CellsAngiogenesis Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID27549930
PMCPMC4994029
OpenAlexW2510834891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.