Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27549768›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2016

Management of Narcolepsy.

Lucie Barateau, Régis Lopez, Yves Dauvilliers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. What is it like to live with narcolepsy? A scoping review.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sleep Disturbances in Patients with Autoimmune Encephalitis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Sleep and neurological autoimmune diseases.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The Risk of Hospitalization for Motor Vehicle Accident Injury in Narcolepsy and the Benefits of Stimulant Use: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Translational gap in ongoing clinical trials for glioma.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucie BarateauSleep-Wake Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, Hôpital Gui-de-Chauliac, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Régis LopezSleep-Wake Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, Hôpital Gui-de-Chauliac, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Yves DauvilliersSleep-Wake Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, Hôpital Gui-de-Chauliac, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France. y-dauvilliers@chu-montpellier.fr.
Hôpital Gui de Chauliac · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementNarcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and type 2 (NT2) are two rare neurological diseases, classified as central disorders of hypersomnolence. The pathophysiology of NT1 is well known; it is caused by the selective destruction of hypocretin (Hcrt) neurons, by a highly suspected autoimmune process. On the contrary, little is known about NT2 etiology, sharing with NT1 somnolence and signs of dysregulation of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, but not cataplexy. Management strategies are rather codified, at least in adults, with a lifelong treatment required in NT1, whereas no pharmacological study focused only on NT2 patients, with sometimes spontaneous improvement or disappearance of their symptoms. We recommend that medications and guidelines in NT2 should be the same as for NT1 (except for cataplexy), but the benefit risk ratio should be reassessed regularly. The main symptom in both diseases is a disabling excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). First-line medications should be stimulants such as modafinil, armodafinil, or sodium oxybate, second-line methylphenidate and pitolisant, where available, and amphetamines as third-line therapy. Sodium oxybate has the advantage to be also effective to manage the fragmented nocturnal sleep, another common symptom in NT1. We advise to wait a few weeks with a stimulant drug before starting an anticataplectic treatment in NT1, except for severe cataplexy. Furthermore, cataplexy treatment should not be systematic. First-line strategy is the use of sodium oxybate, the only drug approved for cataplexy and EDS in adults. However, antidepressant agents such as venlafaxine are also commonly used, with few adverse effects and a good efficacy, although based on expert consensus only. A clinically relevant tool is required to quantify the severity of narcolepsy, subjective symptoms, and their consequences, to monitor the treatment efficacy, and to finally optimize narcolepsy management. In the future, Hcrt replacement or Hcrt agonists will certainly be options to treat NT1, but for now the different peptides do not cross easily the blood brain barrier. Immune-based therapies are other possibilities in NT1, at disease onset, with already some successful attempts to slow down or stop the autoimmune process.

Indexed as

CataplexyHypocretin/orexinNarcolepsy type 1Narcolepsy type 2SleepinessStimulant

Identifiers

PMID27549768
OpenAlexW2516315775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.