ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2017
Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term results of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: A clinical trial.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Trial
- Prolapse recurrence, methods of reoperation, and long-term mesh complications-A nationwide follow-up study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation After Failed Sacrocolpopexy: A Case Series.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic management of presacral retroperitoneal haematoma after sacrocolpopexy.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025Article
- Article
- Laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for severe anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse: an observational cohort study for safety and efficacy at 2-year follow-up.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Observational
- Sacrocolpopexy: The Way I Do It.International urogynecology journal · 2024Review
- Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Sacrocolpopexy-A Surgical Challenge.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Pathological Insights on Polypropylene Mesh Complications From Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Case Series.Cureus · 2024Article
- Safety and medium-term outcome of redo laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a matched case-control study.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- Long-Term Assessment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Reoperation Risk in Obese Women: Vaginal and Laparoscopic Approaches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Long-Term Outcomes after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair in Young Women.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Comparison of first versus second line sacrocolpopexies in terms of morbidity and mid-term efficacy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Adverse outcomes after minimally invasive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in women 65 years and older in the United States.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Outcomes of robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension (RALLS) with mesh for anterior and apical prolapse.Journal of robotic surgery · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic lateral suspension for anterior and apical prolapse: a prospective cohort with standardized technique.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension (LLS) for the Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A New Gold Standard?Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Evaluating the morbidity and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with and without robotic assistance for pelvic organ prolapse.Journal of robotic surgery · 2021Article
- Complications and reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse, impact of hysterectomy, surgical approach and surgeon experience.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
- Laparoscopic management of pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after open sacrocervicopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThere is a lack of knowledge concerning long-term reoperation and complications after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP). We analyzed the rates and indications and potential risk factors for reoperation after LSCP in a large series of consecutive patients.
methodsThis was a single-center, retrospective study including all patients who underwent LSCP between 2003 and 2013. Data regarding pelvic organ prolapse (POP), surgical modalities and perioperative complications were collected. Patients were then contacted by telephone or postal letter in 2014. The main outcome criteria were grade III Dindo classification complications: reoperation for POP recurrence, mesh complications, and urinary incontinence (UI).
resultsBetween January 2003 and December 2013, a total of 464 consecutive patients (mean age, 59 years) underwent LSCP. Almost all (99.1 %) patients presented with POP ≥ grade 3 (POP-Q classification). Long-term evaluations were completed for 391 (84.1 %) patients. The median follow-up was 53.5 ± 28.2 months. The global reoperation rate was 12.5 %. The main reoperation indications were UI-related surgery in 21 patients (5.5 %), POP recurrence surgery in 20 patients (5.1 %), and mesh-related surgery in 11 patients (2.8 %). Multivariate analysis showed that older age at the time of initial surgery and concomitant subtotal hysterectomy were significant protective factors against global reoperation (HR = 0.606, CI 95 % [0.451-0.815] and 0.367, CI 95 % [0.193-0.698] respectively) and reduced the risk of POP recurrence surgery.
conclusionProlapse recurrence and mesh-related surgery occurred in 5.1 and 2.8 % of patients respectively, 4 years after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Age and concomitant subtotal hysterectomy could play a role in the incidence of long-term reoperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.