ArticleBMC systems biology2016
Inferring extrinsic noise from single-cell gene expression data using approximate Bayesian computation.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scalable inference and identifiability of kinetic parameters for transcriptional bursting from single cell data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Quantifying Transcriptome Turnover on Phylogenies by Modeling Gene Expression as a Binary Trait.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Incorporating spatial diffusion into models of bursty stochastic transcription.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Approximate Bayesian computation for inferring Waddington landscapes from single-cell data.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Modelling capture efficiency of single-cell RNA-sequencing data improves inference of transcriptome-wide burst kinetics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Inferring transcriptional bursting kinetics from single-cell snapshot data using a generalized telegraph model.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Molecular Origins of Transcriptional Heterogeneity in Diazotrophic Klebsiella oxytoca.mSystems · 2022Article
- Article
- Efficient exact inference for dynamical systems with noisy measurements using sequential approximate Bayesian computation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Coloured Noise from Stochastic Inflows in Reaction-Diffusion Systems.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2020Article
- Computational Methods for Estimating Molecular System from Membrane Potential Recordings in Nerve Growth Cone.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- How to deal with parameters for whole-cell modelling.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGene expression is known to be an intrinsically stochastic process which can involve single-digit numbers of mRNA molecules in a cell at any given time. The modelling of such processes calls for the use of exact stochastic simulation methods, most notably the Gillespie algorithm. However, this stochasticity, also termed "intrinsic noise", does not account for all the variability between genetically identical cells growing in a homogeneous environment. Despite substantial experimental efforts, determining appropriate model parameters continues to be a challenge. Methods based on approximate Bayesian computation can be used to obtain posterior parameter distributions given the observed data. However, such inference procedures require large numbers of simulations of the model and exact stochastic simulation is computationally costly. In this work we focus on the specific case of trying to infer model parameters describing reaction rates and extrinsic noise on the basis of measurements of molecule numbers in individual cells at a given time point.
resultsTo make the problem computationally tractable we develop an exact, model-specific, stochastic simulation algorithm for the commonly used two-state model of gene expression. This algorithm relies on certain assumptions and favourable properties of the model to forgo the simulation of the whole temporal trajectory of protein numbers in the system, instead returning only the number of protein and mRNA molecules present in the system at a specified time point. The computational gain is proportional to the number of protein molecules created in the system and becomes significant for systems involving hundreds or thousands of protein molecules.
conclusionsWe employ this simulation algorithm with approximate Bayesian computation to jointly infer the model's rate and noise parameters from published gene expression data. Our analysis indicates that for most genes the extrinsic contributions to noise will be small to moderate but certainly are non-negligible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.