Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27549155›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2016

The comparison of perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted and open partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhonghua Shen, Linguo Xie, Wanqin Xie, Hailong Hu, Tao Chen, Chen Xing, Xiaoteng Liu, Hao Xu, Yu Zhang, Zhouliang Wu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhonghua ShenDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Pingjiang Road 23, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Linguo XieDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Pingjiang Road 23, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Wanqin XieKey Laboratory of Genetics and Birth Health of Hunan Province, The Family Planning Research Institute of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, 410126, China.
Hailong HuDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Pingjiang Road 23, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Tao ChenDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Pingjiang Road 23, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Chen XingDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Pingjiang Road 23, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Xiaoteng LiuDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Pingjiang Road 23, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Hao XuDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Pingjiang Road 23, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Pingjiang Road 23, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Zhouliang WuDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Pingjiang Road 23, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Dawei TianDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Pingjiang Road 23, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China. daweitian@163.com.
Changli WuDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Pingjiang Road 23, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China. wujygc2003@163.com.
Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University · CNTianjin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has been widely used worldwide, to determine whether RAPN is a safe and effective alternative to open partial nephrectomy (OPN) via the comparison of RANP and OPN.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was performed within the databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase updated on 30 September 2015. Summary data with their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects or fixed effects model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also evaluated.

resultsA total of 16 comparative studies including 3024 cases were used for this meta-analysis. There are no significant differences in the demographic characteristic between the two groups, but the age was lower and the tumor size was smaller for the RAPN group. RAPN had a longer operative time and warm ischemia time but which showed less estimated blood loss, hospital stay, and perioperative complications. No differences existed in the margin status, the change of glomerular filtration rate, transfusion rate, and conversion rate between the two groups. There was no significant publication bias.

conclusionsRAPN offered a lower rate of perioperative complications, less estimated blood loss, and shorter length of hospital stay than OPN, suggesting that RAPN can be an effective alternative to OPN. Well-designed prospective randomized controlled trials will be helpful in validating our findings.

Indexed as

Blood Component TransfusionBlood Loss, SurgicalConversion to Open SurgeryGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidney NeoplasmsLength of StayMargins of ExcisionNephrectomyOperative TimeRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeWarm IschemiaMeta-analysisOpen partial nephrectomyRenal tumorRobot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Identifiers

PMID27549155
PMCPMC4994255
OpenAlexW2517200665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.