Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27549127›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

A new motor synergy that serves the needs of oculomotor and eye lid systems while keeping the downtime of vision minimal.

Mohammad Farhan Khazali, Joern K Pomper, Aleksandra Smilgin, Friedemann Bunjes, Peter Thier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Twitches, Blinks, and Fidgets: Important Generators of Ongoing Neural Activity.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad Farhan KhazaliDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Joern K PomperDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Aleksandra SmilginDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Friedemann BunjesDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Peter ThierDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of blinks is to keep the eyes hydrated and to protect them. Blinks are rarely noticed by the subject as blink-induced alterations of visual input are blanked out without jeopardizing the perception of visual continuity, features blinks share with saccades. Although not perceived, the blink-induced disconnection from the visual environment leads to a loss of information. Therefore there is critical need to minimize it. Here we demonstrate evidence for a new type of eye movement serving a distinct oculomotor demand, namely the resetting of eye torsion, likewise inevitably causing a loss of visual information. By integrating this eye movement into blinks, the inevitable down times of vision associated with each of the two behaviors are synchronized and the overall downtime minimized.

Indexed as

BlinkingEye MovementsOcular Physiological PhenomenaAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotor NeuronsOculomotor MusclesVision, Ocularblinkingeye movementshumanhuman biologymedicineneurosciencevision stabilityvision suppression

Identifiers

PMID27549127
PMCPMC5012861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.