Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27549106›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2017

Human barrier models for the in vitro assessment of drug delivery.

Matthias Schweinlin, Angela Rossi, Nina Lodes, Christian Lotz, Stephan Hackenberg, Maria Steinke, Heike Walles, Florian Groeber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. ReBiA-Robotic Enabled Biological Automation: 3D Epithelial Tissue Production.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Activity of Tracheal Cytotoxin ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthias SchweinlinDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (TERM), University Hospital Wuerzburg, Roentgenring 11, 97070, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Angela RossiDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (TERM), University Hospital Wuerzburg, Roentgenring 11, 97070, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Nina LodesDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (TERM), University Hospital Wuerzburg, Roentgenring 11, 97070, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Christian LotzDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (TERM), University Hospital Wuerzburg, Roentgenring 11, 97070, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Stephan HackenbergDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Maria SteinkeDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (TERM), University Hospital Wuerzburg, Roentgenring 11, 97070, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Heike WallesDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (TERM), University Hospital Wuerzburg, Roentgenring 11, 97070, Wuerzburg, Germany. Heike.Walles@uni-wuerzburg.de.
Florian GroeberTranslational Center Wuerzburg "Regenerative Therapies for Oncology and Musculoskeletal Diseases", Würzburg branch of the Fraunhofer IGB, Roentgenring 11, 97070, Wuerzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro test systems gain increasing importance in preclinical studies to increase the predictivity and reduce animal testing. Of special interest herein are barrier tissues that guard into the human body. These barriers are formed by highly specialized tissues such as the skin, the airways, and the intestine. However, to recapitulate these tissues, researchers are currently restricted by a lack of suitable supporting scaffolds. In this study, we present biological scaffolds based on decellularized porcine gut segments that offer a natural environment for cell growth and differentiation. Employing these scaffolds, human barrier models of the skin, the airways, and the intestine that mimic the natural histological architecture of the respective tissue are generated. These models show tissue specific barrier properties, such as the stratification of the skin, the mucociliary phenotype of the airways, and polarization of the intestinal epithelium. To investigate the transport characteristics of the intestinal test system, we incubated the tissue models with fluorescein (P

Indexed as

Animal Testing AlternativesIntestinal MucosaIntestinesNasal MucosaSkinTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiological TransportCells, CulturedEpithelial CellsFibroblastsHumansKeratinocytesMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPharmaceutical PreparationsSwinePharmaceutical PreparationsAlternative to animal testingDrug deliveryHuman barrier tissueIn vitro modelTissue engineering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.