Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27549030›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Drone exposure to the systemic insecticide Fipronil indirectly impairs queen reproductive potential.

Guillaume Kairo, Bertille Provost, Sylvie Tchamitchian, Faten Ben Abdelkader, Marc Bonnet, Marianne Cousin, Jacques Sénéchal, Pauline Benet, André Kretzschmar, Luc P Belzunces and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Impact of the pesticide fipronil on honey quality and the survival of Apis mellifera bees.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current Insights into Sublethal Effects of Pesticides on Insects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Guillaume KairoINRA, UR 406 Abeilles &Environnement, Toxicologie Environnementale, Avignon, 84914, France.
Bertille ProvostSUPAGRO, Laboratoire de Pathologies de l'Abeille, Montpellier, 34090, France.
Sylvie TchamitchianINRA, UR 406 Abeilles &Environnement, Toxicologie Environnementale, Avignon, 84914, France.
Faten Ben AbdelkaderINRA, UR 406 Abeilles &Environnement, Toxicologie Environnementale, Avignon, 84914, France.
Marc BonnetINRA, UR 406 Abeilles &Environnement, Toxicologie Environnementale, Avignon, 84914, France.
Marianne CousinINRA, UR 406 Abeilles &Environnement, Toxicologie Environnementale, Avignon, 84914, France.
Jacques SénéchalINRA, UR 406 Abeilles &Environnement, Toxicologie Environnementale, Avignon, 84914, France.
Pauline BenetSUPAGRO, Laboratoire de Pathologies de l'Abeille, Montpellier, 34090, France.
André KretzschmarINRA, UR 546 Biostatistiques &Processus Spatiaux, Avignon, 84914, France.
Luc P BelzuncesINRA, UR 406 Abeilles &Environnement, Toxicologie Environnementale, Avignon, 84914, France.
Jean-Luc BrunetINRA, UR 406 Abeilles &Environnement, Toxicologie Environnementale, Avignon, 84914, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A species that requires sexual reproduction but cannot reproduce is doomed to extinction. The important increasing loss of species emphasizes the ecological significance of elucidating the effects of environmental stressors, such as pesticides, on reproduction. Despite its special reproductive behavior, the honey bee was selected as a relevant and integrative environmental model because of its constant and diverse exposure to many stressors due to foraging activity. The widely used insecticide Fipronil, the use of which is controversial because of its adverse effects on honey bees, was chosen to expose captive drones in hives via syrup contaminated at 0.1 μg/L and gathered by foragers. Such environmental exposure led to decreased spermatozoa concentration and sperm viability coupled with an increased sperm metabolic rate, resulting in drone fertility impairment. Subsequently, unexposed queens inseminated with such sperm exhibited fewer spermatozoa with lower viability in their spermatheca, leaving no doubt about the detrimental consequences for the reproductive potential of queens, which are key for colony sustainability. These findings suggest that pesticides could contribute to declining honey bee populations through fertility impairment, as exemplified by Fipronil. More broadly, reproductive disorders should be taken into consideration when investigating the decline of other species.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleFertilityInsecticidesMalePyrazolesReproductionSexual Behavior, AnimalSpermatozoaEnvironmental PollutantsfipronilInsecticidesPyrazoles

Identifiers

PMID27549030
PMCPMC4994044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.